User talk:Georg Hurtig

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Georg Hurtig! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:Marek69. 02:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

No problem
I will come back on 16th Jan and revert again! doesn't matter! 69.156.51.43 (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Good morning
Thanks for taking a break and for your good, practical suggestions on the talkpage. In the interests of trying to create a positive editing environment, would you be willing to edit your comment and remove the two sentences about emotional ties and aggressiveness etc. Although it may be true, saying so may not be the most helpful thing. --Slp1 (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Georg, do you really think that your most recent comments about IP69 are helpful? We are so close to solving this and then you do precisely what I have asked you (both) not to do, to guess at the motivations of others. See WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF. I ask you to refactor (rewrite) your comments, please. --Slp1 (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Je pense reellement que mon commentaire recent pointait au coeur du probleme: les inconsistences dans l'argumentation d'IP69 indiquent qu'il nous cache la vraie raison de ses actions. Tout serait facile s'il nous l'avouait. Pourtant, par consideration pour vous, j'ai modifie mon commentaire. -- Georg Hurtig (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Merci beaucoup. Nous avons tous et toutes notre point de vue, et des raisons pour nos actions. Comme j'ai déjà mentionné, les commentaires comme ça n'avancent pas la conversation et n'amiliore pas les relations. --Slp1 (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I promised that I'd come back here to edit the article PISA. I think that the league table covering OECD nations is generally okay and that is why I simply re-added the table coverning non-OECD nations without removing the league table that you had made. Do you have any opinion for my edit? I am looking forward to your reply. thanks!  I wish you could help me to improve the tables covering non-OECD nations if you have time. 65.95.0.190 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't know how to correctly add a non-OECD nations to the main table without making mistake. Is that possible to retain those tables for the 2003 and 2006 tests?  because the league table (only OECD nations were shown) merely shows the year of 2000 (Reading only without other categories), the year of 2003 (Maths only without Science and Reading) and the year of 2006 (Science only without Maths and Reading).  I wish you could help me to edit and make an improvement on that table in case you want to integrate into one table.  I don't know how to do that; so the best way is that you can give me a hand and kindly go there and edit.  Many thanks! (I will come back after 15th Feb 2010, I am quite busy at this moment; sorry about that) 65.95.0.190 (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)