User talk:George.boeck

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Diehl (November 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hanns Diehl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hanns_Diehl Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hanns_Diehl reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  20:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hanns Diehl has been accepted
 Hanns Diehl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Onel 5969  TT me 18:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hanns_Diehl help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

copyright
So I took at look at Draft:Anna Spitzmüller and noticed you copied 95% of it from this blog entry. I'm guessing the blog entry is yours because you specifically say you're going to take it to Wikipedia but here's the problem: Wikipedia assumes every other source asserts copyright unless they SPECIFICALLY identify their content as public domain/ creative commons or we can determine such. Right now, I could say that you stole content from another source (without even attributing it) and I could request that draft be deleted per WP:COPYVIO. What you need to do is mark your blog (if it is yours) as public domain (or at least CC-BY-SA). That, or you need to entirely re-write your draft. We get this problem from time to time when someone develops text in a blog and then decides to write a Wikipedia entry not realizing they're not allowed to steal their own words. Please fix. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 03:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * My helpful Chris:
 * I'm working on putting a note on the wordpress blog saying it is CC-BY-SA, whatever that means. Sadly, I have no idea how to respond to your thoughtful note.  Your talk site asks me to do it from this note.  Maybe this will work.  The exact text is from a * footnote and says: *This post was written by Erika Esau who states that it is CC-BY-SA, a form of open source, free-use, copyright waived bit of intellectual property.
 * I went on to denigrate the Wikipedia editors who are trying to frustrate the effort to post this stalwart woman's bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George.boeck (talk • contribs) 00:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It would appear published your draft into mainspace without looking at the COPYVIO report but your note removes any legal stumbling blocks. It's a decent article. Thanks for your patience with this. Wikipedia as an organization was formed by the "big fish in small ponds" and to that end, might not be what many outside writers might expect or agree with.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, for making sure everything is in compliance! :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Annie Harmon in her studio ca 1887.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Annie Harmon in her studio ca 1887.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)