User talk:George3569

I find the section on Florida that you just amended in the "Sex Offender Registration" article to be very confusing. I actually live in Florida myself but I'm not very skilled in legal jargon so I'm not sure what the "Single Subject" Rule is. Arguing that a whole lot of stuff was illegally and unlawfully enacted is probably opinionated and since Wikipedia is a neutral site, I'm not sure we're really supposed to put that in articles. Florida is remarkably unusual in that it requires all felons and not just sex offenders to register after prison (see 775.13 of Fla law), although at least based on the wording of 775.13 it seems that the Fla. felon registry is only available to law enforcement. (Unlike the sex offender and sex predator sites that are easily available online.) If the sex offender registry is illegal under the Single Subject Rule in Fla., that would arguably mean the Florida felon registry is illegal as well. I'm no fan of sex offender registries myself, as I added the studies to the "effectiveness and consequences" section that show that having a police only sex offender registry decreases recividism but making the info public increases recividism. I also added to the Wiki article that the RSO's wife and children, not just the sex offender themself, faces hardship due to sex offender laws and living restrictions, which is something politicians rarely think about when they pass sex offender laws to "save just one woman or child." However, 942.0017 and the Heggs v State case have to do with split sentencing and I'm not sure what they have to do with sex offender laws. The section on Fla on the sex offender registration article is so confusing I can barely understand what it says, can you at least explain to me what it means? Also, can you change that Florida subsection to make it easier to understand so people who read the Wiki article have a clue what they're reading? From Excellentman9999