User talk:GeorgeGreyhound

Hello, I'm Canley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bronwyn Bishop have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Canley (talk) 05:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Annastacia Palaszczuk, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jodi McKay, you may be blocked from editing. --Cube00 (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Andrews. --Canley (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 02:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Sounds silly but trust me GeorgeGreyhound (talk) 07:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * When editing this page, click "edit" and not "new section" to avoid introducing unnecessary section headers, and place your unblock request in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window. This is easier to do in the full version of Wikipedia in a browser on your phone, the app and mobile version do not have full functionality. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

How is leaving my phone on when I wasn’t looking made my account “compromised”? GeorgeGreyhound (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I got banned
Apparently when your son touches your phone is enough to say your account is “compromised” and I have now been banned. This is an abuse of power over very minor edits that would’ve brought humour to someone who doesn’t understand at the time GeorgeGreyhound (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You say this like it happened once (you accidentally left your phone unlocked and your son made some "humorous" edits) – not that it happened nine times over nine months, and each time you were alerted/warned by other editors and administrators which you seem to have ignored. You have not indicated that you intend to do anything to prevent this happening again, such as improving the security of your device or account, or having a word with your son to ask/tell him not to do these things. Lastly, you see the vandalism as witty and humorous anyway. So taking your explanation at face value, I think calling your account "compromised" is quite a fair assessment. --Canley (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

That’s fine I’m sure won’t happen again by hence adding a password to my computer phone. So with these appropriate changes I believe I should be unbanned

And I said the person who did it would’ve thought it was humours but they didn’t understand ramifications of this. Don’t twist my words as I never said I thought it was funny

Also, I didn’t even know this existed until I was banned because it doesn’t appear on the phone version unless you’re looking for it GeorgeGreyhound (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)