User talk:GeorgeTannerGeorge

Speedy deletion of Draft:ToxNav


The page Draft:ToxNav has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 331dot (talk) 11:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 11:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
Someone else will review your request, but you may propose a new username by following the instructions in the block notice. You may replace your above request with one that proposes a new username and simultaneously requests unblock. Please also note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place for you or your company to tell about its products. We are only interested in what independent reliable sources state about article subjects that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

rename to G30rg3T3nn3r not successful
Too similar to existing user name. Please select again.--  Deep fried  okra    21:25, 9 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I have renamed your account from "OxfordCancerBiomarkers" to "GeorgeTannerGeorge"., do you think that the assurance above about avoiding conflict-of-interest editing makes an unblock reasonable? JamesBWatson (talk) 18:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think it's reasonable. 331dot (talk) 19:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)