User talk:GeorgeWright79

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Grimoald, King of the Lombards, and I noticed that your username, "NYCWhiteGallery", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Vineyard Beverly Hills. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''You were undone twice by user:Roxy the dog. You asked about it at the Teahouse and I told you that I agreed with the removal, and that you should discuss it on the article's talk page so that other interested editors could see it and comment. Instead you restored part of it again.'' Meters (talk) 02:56, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Please read WP:PROMO, and please read and comply with the previous message about your username. Meters (talk) 02:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

== I am sorry for reposting a couple of times - I am totally new at this and thought I was not posting the material property. Then I wanted to see if I made it really clear I was not a proponent of the current owners ==

But people still felt necessary to delete it. Can someone please explain how making it known that someone is in a financial crisis is promotional? And you are not allowed to post material from major news sources if it is in any way complementary (and it was only complementary to the property not the owners).
 * Your claim that celebrities who happened to attend parties on the property are actually interested in purchasing the property is promotional garbage. Meters (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Now I know there is some sort of emotional bias here - something rampant in Wikipedia that I personally would love to root out
I never said that Rihanna or James Cameron or the other celebs who utilized the property were interested in buying it, did it? There was 1 possible offer from 1 celebrity, which given the nature of the property and the stature of its previous owners would not seem unusual.GeorgeWright79 (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your comments are unwarranted. I have no emotional bias here. You are trying to stuff inappropriate material into the article. Your addition The property has had buyers and interest from some of the world's current most successful celebrities, including Tom Cruise, who recently considered an offer of $400 million https://bhcourier.com/courier-e-edition-login/ . Prior to that, it attracted other top celebrity interest from stars such as Rhiannon in her Diamond Ball fundraiser at the Vineyard https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rihanna-pays-it-forward-d_b_6345522 and James Cameron, Halle Berry, and Charlize Thereon celebrated the first "Fame and Philanthropy" Oscar event as well. can certainly be interpreted as meaning that those celebrities were interested in purchasing the property. If that's not what you mean then that material is even less appropriate for the article. We do not need to report on which celebritites happen to have attended parties on the property.
 * There's no point in you continuing this, You are indefinitely blocked. Good bye. Meters (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)