User talk:George Klaudiny

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:George Klaudiny/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:George Klaudiny/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:George_Klaudiny/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:George_Klaudiny/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liancetalk/contribs 13:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angel of the North (2017 film) (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angel of the North (2017 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Angel of the North (2017 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Angel_of_the_North_(2017_film) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Angel_of_the_North_(2017_film) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angel of the North (2017 film) (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Angel of the North (2017 film) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:George_Klaudiny Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:George_Klaudiny reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   20:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

COI
You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

More
Thanks for your message, but please read what I posted before. You have not replied to my COI request, nor do you appear to have understood the section on copyright. The deletion notice makes it clear that the reason for deletion is that text was copied from non-free sites as listed in the notice. For legal reasons, we cannot host text which isn't free to use for any purpose, including commercial.

Secondly, the article was full of unsourced opinions, rather than properly referenced facts, examples include This image is an enigma because its author has never explained it... the Finnish population’s favourite painting... like a catharsis for her.... It questions the mysteries of the human soul, of death and the existence of angels... Melancholy, hope, humanism and nordic shamanism come together to resolve the enigma of The Wounded Angel... a painting that provokes discussion about art, passion, death, evilness, the existence of angels and ultimately hope &mdash;, we don't want your opinions, copied opinions or a personal review of the article, we need verifiable facts such as it winning the Jussi awards.

Not all your references are suitable either: An investigation which collects confessions and symbolist visions is sourced to Unifrance, but that seems to be just an anonymous personal review itself, with no actual facts in that section. For reception, aggregate sites like Rotten Tomatoes are best

The film is probably notable, so once you have clarified any COI, we may be able to find a way forward. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you were an employee of an associated company, involved in making, distributing or promoting the film, or undertaking any role which could lead to financial gain, you are required to post on your user page as above
 * If you have a non-financial COI, for example being a friend of someone in the film, in the interests of transparency you should state that on the article talk page. If you are claiming to have no connection, just reply on my talk page or ping me here.
 * As far as I can see, all the copyright and other problems arose in the plot section. Once the COI issue is clear, I could restore as a draft without that section, which would save you some work Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * OK, I've restored at the original draft title and tweaked it a bit for MoS etc. Note that other problems may still remain, and it will need to be resubmitted for review again when you are ready Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You still haven't read my previous posts. You have added more opinions, and the only source you added was unsuitable and didn't even support the text you referenced it with. I'm not going to keep on saying this, please don't persist in ignoring our guidelines and my advice, Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The plot section isn't required to have references, but it must describe what a viewer sees or hears, not what emotions he or she feels, nor what opinion they have. Take your time with this. Have a look at Aitraaz. It's a Featured Article, so you don't need that standard, but it may help with style and structure Jimfbleak</b> -  talk to me?  16:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angel of the North (2017 film) has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Angel of the North (2017 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 12:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Angel_of_the_North_(2017_film) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.