User talk:George Lexington61

July 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicola Adams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – 2 . O . Boxing  10:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * OK George Lexington61 (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football, you may be blocked from editing. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Brownhill, you may be blocked from editing. – 2 . O . Boxing  10:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Nope, I'm not in a content dispute mate. George Lexington61 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicola Adams. – 2 . O . Boxing  10:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)