User talk:George Orr0802

March 2017
Hello, I'm Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anglican Shrine of Our Lady of Walsingham have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 02:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Duncan Rhodes


A tag has been placed on Duncan Rhodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 12:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
This is to let you know that your edit on Major histocompatibility complex is wrong and noncostructive. Duncan Rhodes is not in the Nobel list. Your edit has been reverted. Chhandama (talk) 03:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)