User talk:George Washington Head

Speedy deletion of User:George Washington Head
A tag has been placed on User:George Washington Head, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ArcAngel (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I dont see the problem here. Its a user page. Im sorry it bothers you that I love George Washington so much. You dont have to watch him if you want. It leaves more George to fill my mind with.George Washington Head (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Can I have an administrator intervention if that is possible? I would really like to keep my page. Because George isnt around. (I'm not stupid) I only like the spirit of George Washington(father of our country, founded one day off,). This historical, intelligent man should not be forgotten like Ben Franklin.George Washington Head (talk) 03:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem as I see it, is that I do not believe you can directly copy content from an article and use it in your userpage, as you have done. If I am wrong, I would like to be pointed to that particular policy.  ArcAngel (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

George Washington's birthday
Hello and thanks for the note.

If you go to the article about February 22, you will find George Washington listed in the Births section along with some other notable people born on the same day in different years. I don't think there's a need for a separate article whose sole purpose is to advise a reader of George Washington's birthday and nothing else. SWik78 (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:George Washington Head
A tag has been placed on User:George Washington Head, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ArcAngel (talk) 12:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Userpage content
You can not copy content from articles and use them on your user page, as you have done (and are doing). You need to have ORIGINAL content on your user page, and not something taken a Wikipedia article. That's why your page was deleted. Come up with something ORIGINAL and your page will be allowed to stay. ArcAngel (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * There is no such rule or even an implication of such a rule, according to WP:USERPAGE. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 12:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My apologies for the disruption then. ArcAngel (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem... Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 15:46, 17 March 2008

I like my content better, anyways George Washington Head (talk) 17:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)