User talk:Georgeellery95

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Willie Jimmy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- West.andrew.g (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore was changed by Georgeellery95 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941252 on 2011-02-26T03:18:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shrewsbury School, you may be blocked from editing. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shrewsbury School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - David Biddulph (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg, jack and baz


A tag has been placed on Greg, jack and baz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 4twenty42o (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)