User talk:GeorgesRomme

Welcome!
Hello, GeorgesRomme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Resource slack
Hello Georges. You can also add direct links to the cited articles by adding |url= to the citation template. The identification and search for sources is easier to our readers. More at WP:REFBEGIN. Thanks. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 14:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Double linking for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double linking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Double linking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DougInAMug talk 21:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I'll add various other sources to this page to demonstrate that this notion is not an exotic one. GeorgesRomme (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I just saw the page has already been deleted. Is this the "consensus" seeking mechanism we want at Wikipedia? NB: I'm a university professor with a full workload. I was invited on 2 April to add to this discussion here, but only get less than 3 weeks to find the time to do so? GeorgesRomme (talk) 10:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Here are a bunch of publications on "double linking"; the first five by other authors, the last three I've written:
 * https://doi.org/10.1145/2962695.2962701
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1236(03)00265-9
 * https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-1991-10207
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1640785922/fulltextPDF/7F41D0B9EB7048D1PQ/1?accountid=27128
 * https://www.proquest.com/docview/911987421/D4ACF179D62547DDPQ/4?accountid=27128
 * https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507697282004
 * https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(95)00048-8
 * https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260110405 GeorgesRomme (talk) 10:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)