User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archives/2014/April

my sock puppet investigation pt 2^
Hi again, recently you were in charge of my sockpuppet investigation. I added a comment some weeks ago, which was deleted. Maybe because i was doing it wrong. I moved it to a different section, but it got deleted again. Can you explain to me please a) what i did wrong and b) how can i make sure that my statement is archived? Thank you very much. I also just read about that user deleting my comments (on arbitration requests pages, his talk page i just visited), that he was involved with similar issues in the past. I personally now feel afraid - said user seem to follow my activities closely, like he was immediately commenting on portals i asked questions and such. Is there a way i can circumvent interaction with him other than totally refraining from wikipedia? Rka001 (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Ok... Regarding your comments on the archived case, it's archived; it's not supposed to be changed like you wanted to.  I appreciate your concern, but it was closed without any action taken, you can ignore it at this point.  Your comments here put your concerns on the record.
 * Regarding Ryulong; if he's following you on other noticeboards that he didn't used to, please let me know where and I can take a look at it.
 * Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I have spent the whole morning reading accounts on that user in and even outside wikipedia, and i decided to really stay away from anything that could furtherly incite the conflict. It seems like always ending up in time consuming stress for everybody. Its very intimidating for a very normal user like me. Anyway - it could be that i am entirely wrong on anything and just overly sensitive, but it would be very nice to have neutral editors overlooking the development of AKB48. Its a delicate topic (basically 90 girls being casted to strip a special audience of their money, but with tremendous success), and the article itself is in bad shape and needs serious work, but ryulong has its own opinion on many things here, the most obvious problem being that he thinks every other editor not sharing his views is a subjective fan that needs to be shut down. Since he started to edit there some months ago, the once peaceful talk page has developed into a warzone. The other day, users were exhaustively warring about list ordering(!). Several users (incl. me) have stated they are going to stop working on that article. So, it would be nice if some could watch over it from time to time, but i do not know whom to ask. Rka001 (talk) 10:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions
Your comments on Second Quantization's talk page about DS warnings prompted this conversation at User talk:Callanecc/Archive 10 because it also involved Pseudoscience DS. I'm not trying to stir things up but it seems like there are very different interpretations over who can give DS warnings, how they are given, what "uninvolved" means and whether or not warnings need to be logged in on the AC DS page.

I realize that currently, policy regarding DS is being reviewed but I ask some questions of Callanecc and he/she states I should ask you them instead since you posted the original comments on SQ's talk page. If you have any response to that conversation, I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)