User talk:Georgiacatcrimson

Greetings...
Hello, Georgiacatcrimson, and  welcome to Wikipedia! 
 * To get started, click on the green welcome.
 * I hope you like it here and decide to stay!
 * Happy editing! Pupster21 Talk To Me 12:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 12:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC) However, please do not remove content from talk pages.

Fictional spoiled brats
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Fictional spoiled brats, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Tomboys
Why did you revert my edit on List of tomboys in fiction as vandalism? I gave a very good reason why I removed Sakura, Ino and Temari. None of them exhibit tomboyish behaviour. JadziaLover (talk) 13:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why you don't just answer my question. What is so tomboyish about Sakura, Ino, and Temari? There's no need to remove the entire entry, if we can just come to an agreement. JadziaLover (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Why didn't you ever simply explain why you thought Sakura, Ino, and Temari were tomboys? I really would like to understand your reasoning. JadziaLover (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional spoiled brats
I have nominated List of fictional spoiled brats, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of fictional spoiled brats. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 14:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I would suggest avoiding leaving comments like this as they cause you to appear to have vandalistic intentions. JuJube (talk) 21:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of tomboys in fiction
I have nominated List of tomboys in fiction, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of tomboys in fiction. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 15:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Better place to leave your comments
Hi Georgiacatcrimson. I notice you've been leaving your opinion about the deletion debates above on various talk pages. However, More people would see your comments if you added them on the main Afd pages here and here. Just add your comments to the bottom of the discussion.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Spoiled brat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Two One Six Five Five  τʃ 16:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the email
You are also invited to contribute to my insults page or, if you are in a more inquisitive mood, to my Q&A page.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing cleanup/citation needed tags on List of tomboys in fiction
The mass removal of cleanup/citation needed tags without providing any reasonable explanation is a form of vandalism. Especially when the cleanup tags have been placed on the article in good faith by another editor. If you are unable find references that verifies each item on the list, then either leave the item alone or remove the entire item after a reasonable period of time after the tag was first placed. Continued removal of the cleanup tags without fixing the problem or providing any explanation may result in you being blocked from Wikipedia. --Farix (Talk) 12:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Greman Knight . 10:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

AFD
I removed your AFD tag because you hadn't added the 2nd proposal to the log. If you reread the process, you perhaps see where you went wrong. You might have another go at fixing it up properly. I think your effort would be better spent in finding cites for the entries that you would like to see in this list. There are lots of sources out there and you can see from my examples how it is done. I recommend Google Books as a place to look. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bilby (talk) 12:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of tomboys in fiction
I have nominated List of tomboys in fiction, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of tomboys in fiction&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Mark Chovain 02:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Bloody anime series
I have nominated bloody anime series for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 07:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)