User talk:Georgiagirl502

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Georgiagirl502


A tag has been placed on User:Georgiagirl502 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. INeverCry  16:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

User page
Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of leeway is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking medium, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV/resume or lengthy autobiography. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Georgiagirl502. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article DeAngelo Tyson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 16:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Georgiagirl502, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to DeAngelo Tyson has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Georgiagirl502 (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm new to this and did not know. I'd like to go in and edit what was entered to have it conform to Wikipedia's terms but that option is not there. Do I need to start over?


 * You're welcome to go and edit the page again to pare down the content. Just leave the db-notwebhost tag at the top alone for now. --Drm310 (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
--Drm310 (talk) 17:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

No CVs
Sorry, but your userpage looked too much like a CV (resumé). CVs are regarded as advertising, because their purpose is usually to sell the person's services to an employer. As you are finding out, Wikipedia isn't social media or a directory. No advertising or promotion is allowed. Neutral editing is welcomed, preferably with reference to reliable independent sources WP:RS - and these are a must in the case of bios of living people, and most strongly advised in the case of anything controversial in other areas too. Feel free to ask questions - most admins and regular editors are willing to answer questions or give opinions. Peridon (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)