User talk:Georgiapayne7/sandbox

Prof. D. Feedback
This is solid, and could use a little refinement. I think Lyric's comments/questions are good. I'm curious as to how you will be integrating this with what exists on the article. and/or what you might be replacing? I think it would be helpful to add some wiki-hyperlinked material especially where it will help to define terms everyone may not understand. Were you able to find any information on how the decrease in down syndrome population poses risks for the extant down syndrome population because of loss of community and resources? I do think your tone is good, citations look mostly good. The one where there's some "check date values" language, try removing it and putting it back in just with the DOI. Sometimes wiki citation manager handles that better. Looking forward to how this all comes together! --T. Danylevich (talk) 16:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Lyric's Peer Rev
Peer review for Georgia Payne (peer review by Lyric Harris): Hey! I thought your article was really informative. I think you did a good job in providing information in an unbiased way. The last section which explains that advocates want parents to make an informed choice (rather than one which favors pro-life or pro-choice) was especially effective in doing this. Maybe you could add a little more information about how the research that Stephens advocates for would benefit people diagnosed with down syndrome. Besides that, I thought your article was really well written!