User talk:Ger6

You have just reverted all my edits, including many (most) unrelated to your attempt to turn the article into a hagiography. That's no longer editing in good faith, but getting close to vandalism. Throwing around silly threats of blocking won't wash, especially as I think that you're on the verge of breaking the Three revert rule, which brings an automatic edit block. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 17:41, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations! You've just broken the 3RR; I see that you're familiar with the experience of being blocked, though. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 18:04, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi Ger6, I understand you have violated the 3RR rule by reverting a text or part of one more than three times in 24 hours. Please go to the talk page of that article and work out your differences there. If you revert the same article again within the next 24 hours, you'll be blocked. SlimVirgin 18:09, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)


 * Also, I suggest you read No personal attacks and What Wikipedia is not. Some of your remarks on Mel's talk page count as personal attacks and indicate that you're advocating a certain position rather than sticking to Neutral point of view. SlimVirgin 18:21, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)


 * As you started reverting again at Oliver North, I've blocked you for 24 hours. If you need to contact me, you can email me by using the "e-mail this user" function on my user page. Also, please note that the creation of sockpuppets to get round 3RR still counts as a violation. SlimVirgin (talk) 05:49, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)


 * Created another sockpuppet to continue reverting. Blocked indefinitely. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:48, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)