User talk:Gergersdoa

AfC notification: Draft:Sexual Grooming in New Zealand has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sexual Grooming in New Zealand. Thanks! joe deckertalk 17:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Child grooming, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 22:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sexual Grooming in New Zealand concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sexual Grooming in New Zealand, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)