User talk:Gerhardtrev's

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from New England Revolution. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_England_Revolution&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Achowat (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll state it slightly more forcefully: you've been doing this for a while as an anonymous editor and should be blocked for it now as a registered editor, but I suspect that there's a story behind this and would like to hear what it is. If it's a valid concern, the supporter's group should be removed. If it's not, stop now. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You did it again and have not engaged anyone in discussion. I have rolled it back as vandalism, and will continue to treat your edits as vandalism if you do not tell us why you keep removing The Rebellion. Achowat (talk) 17:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New England Revolution, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Achowat (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 23:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)