User talk:Gertie dirty

Welcome!
Hi Gertie dirty! I noticed your contributions to Shetland Sheepdog&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! William Harris (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm William Harris. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Shetland Sheepdog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. '' Your edit did not quite achieve what you intended. Please refer your first questions about editing to the WP:TEAHOUSE.'' William Harris (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * They are constructive. Iceland dogs are a genealogical ingredient of Sheltie how on earth can.that be unconstructive... Irrational!! Gertie dirty (talk) 23:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * You placed your text in the middle of a citation, where it does not belong and ruining someone else's citation.
 * You did not provide a source for the "information" that you propose.
 * This is why your edit was unconstructive. Additionally, you might like to change your attitude to something a little more WP:CIVIL. William Harris (talk) 21:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Do not remove citations from articles as you did at Scorpio (astrology). The verifiability policy requires all statements in articles to be supportable by citations to reliable sources. Please note this is your second warning about contributing to articles appropriately. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Western astrology, you may be blocked from editing. Jc3s5h (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I have not removed any text from Scorpio??? It must be an error, apart from that very enjoyable time on Wikipedia,right now, I hope noone envious of this??? Gertie dirty (talk) 02:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

I haven't made any disruptive edits strange to even think that??? Gertie dirty (talk) 02:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Literature or philosophy
Philosophical. Questioning and humanism Gertie dirty (talk) 23:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Rude to say this I was perfectly civil it was you who was unreasonable william Harris I am perfectly sure I was perfectly polite and I have done nothing at all wrong
I sure I am perfectly polite at a times William Harris Gertie dirty (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)


 * In what way am I unreasonable? William Harris (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Removal of citations
I would definitely never remove citations from any other text, I don't know anyone would accuse me of such a thing. I sincerely hope there are no envious bullies on Wikipedia, it's a great idea so bullying would mess the whole thing up. I sincerely hope this person has just made a big mistake otherwise they could well be one of a couple of bullies.. Aghast!!! Gertie dirty (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)