User talk:Getmedown

List of tallest buildings in Newark
Got a reference for the changes you made? Please do provide it to the page. See Verifiability. Djflem (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I have the plans. Getmedown (talk) 00:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Good for you. Not good enough for Wikipedia, unless you put them in a form of Reliable sources.Djflem (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Might want to check out 3RR, too. Djflem (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You literally don’t have a reliable source for your information, at all. Getmedown (talk) 01:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe you’re just happy to put in incorrect information. I don’t know. Getmedown (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Happy to have the correct information. Why don't you provide it instead of just making claims which are not worth the hot air and time you're wasting. You might have privy to it, but that's basically jack-shit worth nothing unless you can prove it. And so far you have not done that have you? PROVE IT, buddy and add a citation....Who are you and why should any believe you if don't back it up? If you got the goods, cough them up, otherwise you edits to Wikipedia will continue to be rejected.
 * Djflem (talk) 01:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.reddit.com/r/Newark/s/JsSHSqGwhP
 * here you go dipshit, and I’ll continue to edit the page. Getmedown (talk) 01:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

How pathetic to resort to name-calling when asked to prove yourself. (See: CIVILITY). What purpose does being smug and lazy and petty and self-righteous serve? Maybe better stick to the a gabby little chat room at Reddit, the baby bla, bla, bla, site where you and your buddies can fight over who's got the biggest one. If you're finding it too difficult to deal with the academic rigor to back up your claims as required to build a encylclopedia, you don't have to. Stay away. It seem that you have added nothing, zilch, nada, to the article but simply demonstrated recentism and engaged in edit warring. Or have you added by using sockpuppetry, using multiple accounts to beat the system (say, like using names like Getmedown & Kalebrocks318)?

Reddit is NOT a reliable source, despite the screen shot of architectural drawings. If you want to edit Wikipedia you need to VERIFY what you publish with RELIABLE sources by CITING them. The "I don't have to follow the rules" attitude/behaviour is childish and tedious. If you don't like, boo-hoo. If you wanna be useful, instead of dicking around, then contact the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat so they can update their database and provide a useful statistics that have been vetted by professionals and upgrade the entry for 777 McCarter/Iqonic. But that would require you actually do something. Do you really give a shit about the the architectural history of Newark anyway? That is what the article is about, not the latest phallus. Djflem (talk) 11:12, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I don’t have multiple accounts, and I don’t like your attitude. Now you’ve seen the drawings and you know the actual height of the building for a fact. Do us both a favor and STFU. Thanks. Getmedown (talk) 11:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Couldn't care less about what you like. Do yourself a favour and go back to the little Reddit playground where your User-generated content might have some gossip value. OR figure out how to responsibly/intelligently edit on Wikipedia, first by reading USERGENERATED and all of the above links. Have adjusted the article with a disclaimer; hopefully you'll STFU now, so no thanks needed. Djflem (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Didn’t I tell you to stfu? Getmedown (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Taking Out The Trash. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Between what accounts? I don’t have any other accounts and I don’t know who you’re talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getmedown (talk • contribs)
 * You are accused of editing in concert with . --Yamla (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

That is probably someone from the r/newark subreddit, where the link to this wiki was posted. They also know the correct height of the building because I have posted the plans there. It is not me. Can’t you see the IP address? Blocking me for what someone else did is ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getmedown (talk • contribs)
 * Please post the link to the reddit post. --Yamla (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Newark/s/mcvEuELS7L

I would imagine kalebrocks is kaledxtentacion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getmedown (talk • contribs)
 * See WP:MEAT. You are indeed editing in concert. --Yamla (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I have no idea what that guy does. To be in concert I would have to have any idea whatsoever that he is editing the page. Until this, I didn’t. I did not recruit anyone to do anything which appears to be a very important characteristic of editing in concert. You are making an error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getmedown (talk • contribs)
 * You are free to make a new unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)