User talk:Gfdhguigh

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elizabeth Lapovsky Kennedy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elizabeth Lapovsky Kennedy was changed by Gfdhguigh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952351 on 2014-10-03T13:40:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fghfdsghsrdhs


A tag has been placed on Fghfdsghsrdhs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fdgdsgresgea


A tag has been placed on Fdgdsgresgea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Neil N  talk to me 13:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gfdsgreheah


A tag has been placed on Gfdsgreheah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 13:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)