User talk:Ggnext

Genmay
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Genmay) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kf4bdy talk contribs 06:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Sup man. Do you have an active account on GenMay? Mine's broken and I need somebody with an account to help me out. Thanks, —Lantoka ( talk 08:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I updated my e-mail address like a year ago and it disabled my account. Could you PM Mr. 2 or something and see if you can't get him to reactivate me? The account name is Lantoka, of course. Thanks! —Lantoka ( talk 09:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Much appreciated. And hopefully this damn article will get undeleted too. We've dug up a lot of evidence of "notability" or whatever... —Lantoka ( talk 09:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:POINT
Greetings, it appears that you have disrupted Wikipedia to illustrate a point on Something Awful, Something Awful Forums and HardOCP. If this message is in error please accept my apologies but if not then please use an article or project's talk page to make your point. Thanks! From: --Drat (Talk) 11:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Screw you, no I didn't.Ggnext 21:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please remain civil. I feel it isn't too much of a leap to call the following 1 2 3 disruption to make a point. While you may have self-reverted all three, the point remains that you seemingly tagged them in bad faith.--Drat (Talk) 09:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did, in accordance with the suggestion by this user - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Saxifrage place these articles up for deletion; however, I reverted them within moments of changing them. And although I did indeed put them up for deletion 'out of bad faith', the articles seem to be worthy of deletion according to the same policy that was cited in the deletion of the 'General Mayhem' article, making the nomination, itself, valid.Ggnext 09:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Sup bro
You may be interested to know that I've obtained a copy of the original Gen[M]ay article, in the hopes that it can be properly sourced and someday undeleted. It's currently residing in my sandbox if you'd like to take a look. Any contributions that you can make to it would be appreciated! —Lantoka ( talk 10:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

My Gen[M]ay account is still deactivated...
It's been several days since you PMed tew. Would it bother you terribly to try Sanjay? Or anybody that you think could do it. Thanks! —Lantoka ( talk 01:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:POINT
This is the only warning you will receive. You have recently been tagging the articles of various websites with notability because an article about your website Genmay was deleted. Both Something Awful and 4chan assert notability, and your tagging them is disruption to make a point. If you do not cease your actions, you will be blocked for disrupting Wikipedia.— Řÿūłóñģ ( 竜龍 ) 21:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)