User talk:Ghajinidetails

Welcome!

 * }

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Fortune India 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to English and Hyderabad


 * Muzaffarpur district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to NTPC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Please provide Edit Summary
Hi, thanks for your contributions to article Infosys. Please remember to include 'Edit Summary' in all your edits. Refer WP:FIES. Cheers, -  Niri M / ನಿರಿ  (Talk) 08:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * While adding information about the company's rank do not bold. And for those company's who rank in Fortune Global 500 it would be better to not to mention their national ranks.--Kkm 010 *  ۩  ۞ 09:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

List_of_companies_of_India
Please join the discussion on the article's talk page (here) before blindly reverting the changes to the article. I have previously carefully detailed the changes and would like to hear your position. At the moment, you appear to have restored a muddled mess - I would appreciate clarification; at the minimum, an edit summary. Kuru  (talk)  00:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the second request to explain your edits on the article's talk page. The list you have added makes no sense - please clearly explain you methodology and sourcing on the article's talk page.  Your e3dit summary does not match the material you added.  Kuru   (talk)  13:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Emraan Hashmi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Raaz


 * Teli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bania

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Narendra Modi
Hello. I saw that you recently made changes to the article page on Narendra Modi, specifically inserting references to his caste as "Ghanchi" and "Teli" based on two reference sources. These reference sources do not quote Narendra Modi himself making the statement, and hence the caste references (often contentious) cannot find space on the article page due to content concerns when adding material related to living persons. Please review Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. Thanks. — Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  19:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Saathiya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Marathi


 * Tech Mahindra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to U.A.E

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Dion Global Solutions Limited for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dion Global Solutions Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dion Global Solutions Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from Dion Global Solutions Limited. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Tata Consultancy Services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IIT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

List of companies of India
I cannot for the life of me figure out what you're trying to do at List of companies of India. This is my THIRD request to ask you to explain your edits on the article's talk page. If you cannot figure out where the talk page is, here is a link. I'm afraid that you may be attempting to completely duplicate a list from forbes/fortune, and this may run into copyright problems. Please read the conversation there and articulate your position before any future edits. Kuru  (talk)  13:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anuradha Acharya


A tag has been placed on Anuradha Acharya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Muhandes (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Anuradha Acharya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Hyderabad


 * Nokia C2-06 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to TFT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anuradha Acharya


The article Anuradha Acharya has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Additi gupta in reality show Zara Nachke Dikha..gif
Thanks for uploading File:Additi gupta in reality show Zara Nachke Dikha..gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. When you recently edited Infosys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canteen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tech Mahindra-Mahindra Satyam merger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tech Mahindra-Mahindra Satyam merger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tech Mahindra-Mahindra Satyam merger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 20:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. When you recently edited Housefull 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alanah rae


The article Alanah rae has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not appear to meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  15:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Austin Kincaid


A tag has been placed on Austin Kincaid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dismas |(talk) 19:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * the debate was at Articles for deletion/Austin Kincaid (3rd nomination) DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bollywood's 100 crore club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Indian


 * Singham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bollywood's 100 crore club


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Bollywood's 100 crore club. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of highest-grossing Bollywood films. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of highest-grossing Bollywood films - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. When you recently edited Education in Bihar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siwan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

About Kuvempu University
Since you're an Indian editor please do contribute on Kuvempu University article.Thanks.--(talk→  Kkm010  ←track )  13:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Source
Hi there. The purpose of sources is to verify information. The source you added here does not seem to verify anything. The same goes for other "sources" you added. --Muhandes (talk) 05:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I have found the same problem in several other article. I'm not sure why you do that, but it starts looking like soap boxing, though I'm not sure what you are trying to promote. Please avoid adding random newspaper articles as sources. Add sources only when they verify a fact that needs verification. --Muhandes (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Facebook, Inc.. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facebook,_Inc.&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 12:12, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Oriental Institute of Science and Technology. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 22:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Edit summary are meant for explaining the edits that are doing to the page. They are not for random scribbling. I have observed that you give wrong edit summaries, mostly your favourite one "providing the much needed sources". Please start using the summary in a manner that helps other users. This clearly isn't as it is deceitful. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

June 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This is the third time I bring this matter to your attention. You editied articles and gave as a source, which does not verify anything. Please stop editing material without providing reliable sources'' Muhandes (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Clarify as to what "much needed sources" do you keep adding to the List of highest-grossing Bollywood films? Your behaviour is becoming very troublesome now, and can easily be construed as disruptive. Stop. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

INCINE notification
Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ''Some players may well have played Test, ODI and T20I. However, in terms of supremacy of formats as decided by WP:CRIC, it goes: Test, ODI, first-class, List A, T20I, T20. So please stop removing mostly List A columns, particularly when their appearances in that format greatly outweigh their T20I/T20 appearances. If you want clarification, WikiProject Cricket is the place to go.'' Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Stats in Infobox
Hey mate wait, stop and discuss your view with others before changing such en masse.--Vyom25 (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * say here whatever your point is.--Vyom25 (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sachin Tendulkar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vyom25 (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rahul Dravid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vyom25 (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Seriously mate, you need to stop for the moment. So far no one has agreed with your changes and there are about five people who are opposed to them. Please let's just have a discussion about this at the cricket talk page and we can come to a consensus. Edit warring is not the way to go. Jenks24 (talk) 13:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Gautam Gambhir, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Vyom25 (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Virender Sehwag, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  TheStrike  Σagle   14:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Seriously. Stop doing it, and stop telling others to do it. There is no consensus for your continued removal of data. Don't bother telling me to "remember" either. One more transgression and you're blocked. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your |talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or submit a request for unblock to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * "Already discussed" does not mean "I have already stated my opinion, so I can ignore everybody else's opinion and keep forcing my version through". JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Jenks24. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This edit, for example, was unacceptable.JamesBWatson (talk) 14:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Ricky Ponting
I have reverted your edit, because a) you have put in your table that he has played 17 T20s and won one of them, but no mention of the other 16 as there are just dashes in the loss, draw or tied games, and b) he seems to have won and lost more ODIs than he played? Considering you praise the accuracy of your sources in your edit summaries, perhaps you ought to check your facts before you put them down. S.G.(GH) ping! 11:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the error I refer to. You noted that he had lost 200 ODI matches which, in addition to those he had won, meant that he had played nearly a 100 more ODIs than he actually did. You have fixed it now anyway, thank you. Incidentally, with regards to your edit summary, I don't know what a KG student is so it's lost on me. S.G.(GH) ping! 14:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * KG refers to Kindergarten! He wanted to say you (A Senior Editor III) a KG student! lol Some people have a very bad sense of comparison!  TheStrike  Σagle   14:46, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * A right. Well hopefully he will discuss his sweeping changes before making them next time, and all should be well. Cheers Strike. S.G.(GH) ping! 08:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please remember: personal attacks on other editors, whether on talk page or in edit summaries, whether spelled out in full or abbreviated, are not permitted. Dweller (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * STOP. If someone has an issue with your edits, you stop and discuss it with them, you don't revert them. Putting your argument in an edit summary is not good enough, particularly when you say "Skagrawal4k,i dont know what type of Wikipedian r u.go and check Sachin,Ponting,Dhoni and some other cricketer pages.Dravid is not captain for the whole career.he has played as a mere player also.What abt those records which shows team's performance" because by "go and check Sachin,Ponting,Dhoni and some other cricketer pages" you mean "go and check the pages I've just edited and you'll find my edit there." That doesn't make your edit right. If you continue you ignore us your account may be blocked permanently. S.G.(GH) ping! 14:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  TheStrike  Σagle   15:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Listen to other people and STOP else you will obviously be blocked  TheStrike  Σagle   15:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Anurita Jha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. copy and paste from  S.G.(GH) ping! 08:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. S.G.(GH) ping! 12:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Ek Tha Tiger
Dont add overseas untill it is provided by boxofficeindia beacuse it is recommended at wikipedia...--Zeeyanketu ✉  19:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rowdy Rathore, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Zeeyanketu ✉  03:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

January 2007
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Zion1985 (talk) 00:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films   &     Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films
Thank you for your information.. i will take it up in my future edits.. Geocraze (talk) 04:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Rajnikanth1
Please explain what connections if any you have to the account User:Rajnikanth1. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not use Wikipedia to provide news, such as you did in the article Gangs of Wasseypur - Part 2 at here *This --Zeeyanketu  ✉  21:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abuse of editing privileges. You are not allowed to operate multiple accounts in order to make it look like there is more support for your position than there actually is--this is called sockpuppetry. Based upon a comparison of this edit by this account and this edit by Ghaijindetails, you are obviously the same editor. Additionally, I have to tell you that your messages are coming off as very aggressive (violating WP:CIVIL), and, furthermore, you're making up policy that doesn't exist. The Wikimedia Foundation, for example, never decides what sources can and cannot be used. That's done by using consensus to analyze whether or not the source meets WP:RS. You seem to be applying your own personal opinion about what is or is not acceptable for Indian box office numbers. Now, it may be that your arguments are good, and we shouldn't use Boxofficeindia; I know nothing about the topic myself. But since the site is currently widely used on Wikipedia, there's clearly a consensus that it's okay. You're going to need to establish that it's not through some sort of centralized discussion, not just through edit warring, sock puppetry, and strongly worded claims on people's talk pages without any actual policy backing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Bol Bachchan

 * Why did you mean by "adding genuine sources" ,you warned many times about this,only boxofficeindia is considered reliable.It seems that you learned nothing from your past adventure. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 08:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * In this case you must be wrong, Zeeyanketu. Times of India is a generally reliable source for most things, which would include box office results. I understand the need to exclude other ranking websites that don't have verified info, but you can't exclude reliable newspapers. Ghajindetails was wrong before to try to replace boxofficeindia with those types of sites, but there's nothing wrong with ToI. The only reason you could exclude ToI is if you know it's out of date. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I have discussed it before I got some warnings related to the same problem when i had started editing thats the reason i stick to this policy and most of websites give boxoffice collections instantly but boxofficeindia take some time and give territorial breakdown accurately .You can watch it in every good article ,only BOI is used . ---zeeyanketu talk to me 02:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That does not change the fact that newspapers are reliable sources, especially a newspaper like ToI. Now, if they provide different totals, it may be appropriate to have both. But no group can flatly say, "This is the only source we accept". They can say "This source is proven to be unreliable" and reject sources, but not ban sources that we know to be generally reliable. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Dont worry that was only running information with respect to the same url and BOI will update end of run figure too. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 07:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Rowdy Rathore
We left it untill end figures are provided by boxofficeindia and how dare you to give me time to justified my statement I know well what i am doing and i am 100% stick to boxofficeindia and gross of kahaani will change too according to it.So,dont try to teach me and put your senseless views on my talkpage. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:38, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, everyone should calm down (by everyone, I mean both of you). Ghajinidetails, it is correct that you shouldn't go around demanding anything. Wikipedia editing is a collaborative process that requires that people work together, not order each other around. Zeeyanketu, you shouldn't call other people senseless; WP:CIVIL says that we have to be nice to each other (in order to make that whole collaborative thing work). Ultimately, here's the real thing: you two are fighting about something that you simply don't need to fight over. There is no harm if Wikipedia's box office numbers aren't immediately up to date, especially not to 4 places of accuracy. This is a generalist encyclopedia, not a movie trivia storehouse. In cases where two or more reliable sources disagree about the box office numbers, we should include both (except, of course, if we know that one of them is just out of date). But be careful there, because we do have to be careful about what is or isn't a reliable source. As I said (here or on Z's talk page), newspapers are definitely reliable sources for this info, but studio/artist web pages are definitely not. I believe that there was a consensus in the past that BOI is reliable and BOH is not, though if there is concern about the issue, it could be discussed again (probably on WP:RSN). Qwyrxian (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Your addition to Dashrath Manjhi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. A sentence was copied verbatim from: http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/1552409/Nawazuddin-to-play-lead-in-Ketan-Mehtas-Mountain-Man GabrielF (talk) 13:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Son of Sardaar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Boss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Jab Tak Hai Jaan Warning
There is no need to mention Son of Sardaar on pages other than that of the film. It is not necessary. It sounds like you are promoting the film by hyping up some clash in the introduction rather than contributing to the article. Such additions make the article feel fanboy-ish and hurt its chances of becoming a featured article. When the time comes Son of Sardaar will be mentioned in the Release and Box Office sections of the film. But that will happen after release and when those sections are written. There is no need to put it in the introduction. Ashermadan (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Duplicate Accounts Warning
We know that you have another account named Sanjeetbond. I would advise you to stop using both accounts to get your point across. If you do not stop I will launch an investigation against you and have your IP addresses blocked from the service. Ashermadan (talk) 01:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Ashermadan, the User:Sanjeetbond was block almost a year ago. So it's not accurate to say this person is using two accounts. However, having said that, do you have any evidence that this person is the same person who used to operate Sanjeetbond? If so, this account would be evading a block. However, you cannot make such accusations without evidence; doing so is a personal attack and can result in you being blocked. If you have evidence, feel free to explain here or on my talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, nevermind, I found the evidence. I've blocked this account indefinitely (block notice in the next post). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Block evasion. You are very clearly the same user as User:Rajnkanth1 and User:Sanjeetbond. So, you got lucky and managed to hang around for about 6 months before we noticed. You do understand that you'll eventually get caught every time, right? You are blocked. If you want to edit Wikipedia, go to your original account and request an unblock. Of course, the fact that you've been socking is going to mean you won't be unblocked, but maybe if you completely left Wikipedia for at least 6 months, then came back and explained what was wrong with your previous behavior, then maybe you could be unblocked. But socking is not the way.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Son of Sardaar (soundtrack)


The article Son of Sardaar (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article belongs to a film which has not released yet and its not too lengthy to fit in the main article.So i think it should be deleted and merged into the main article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kshitij


A tag has been placed on Kshitij, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)