User talk:Ghanghro

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Shelley von Strunckel, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dubaiairshow.org/wellbeing/22/shelly.html. As a copyright violation, Shelley von Strunckel appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shelley von Strunckel has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Shelley von Strunckel. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Shelley von Strunckel, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Allen3 talk 12:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:GRDilley_(6).jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:GRDilley_(6).jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 00:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

about Dilley's Picture
This picture does not have a copyright violation problem as this image has been scanned by meslef just last night from one of my previous collection of photographs.
 * What do you mean by "collection of photographs"? -- MECU ≈ talk 00:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Collection of photographs by my uncle who took this (alongwith) along with many others himself. He is not living now and I possess all his photos collection. Ghanghro 00:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Since you're not the creator of the photo you can't use PD-self. However, if your uncle did not sell the copyright to the photo, then you, as the heir to your uncle's estate, can use PD-release.  In the  discussion page for your image I've suggested how you can change the image description to accurately reflect your intentions.  I don't know the name of your uncle or the date he took it, so I've just included place holders in my example.  If it looks OK, copy it from the  discussion page to the  actual image description page.  Rather than scattering all of the discussion, lets discuss over at  PUI. —RP88 04:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you please put your uncle's name as the author or the image and you as the source. He deserves attribution by name. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 19:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Fastest Bowler) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. andy 10:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:ApnaRishta_Logo.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ApnaRishta_Logo.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:MapRatodero.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:MapRatodero.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:VHOWebSite.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:VHOWebSite.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:GRDilley (12).JPG
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:GRDilley (12).JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:GRDilley (12).JPG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:GRDilley (12).JPG, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:MapRatoderoSmall.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MapRatoderoSmall.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 18:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ghanghro


The article Ghanghro has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:GNG. Using Ghanghro/Ghanghra/Ghangro/Ghangra etc, I've checked JSTOR, GBooks, GWeb and GScholar + some offline sources. There are nothing but mirrors that discuss this tribe. It forms a part of some placenames (not the one in the photo!), may be some sort of pulse/grain and is a skirt worn by women - but I can't find sources even to convert it to one of those purposes: they're just passing mentions in sentences etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 03:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:CDSPAKLogo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CDSPAKLogo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:CDSPAK01.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ShellyVonStrunckel.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:ShellyVonStrunckel.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vho logo.JPG


The file File:Vho logo.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of College of Digital Sciences for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article College of Digital Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/College of Digital Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  14:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CDSLogoSmall.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:CDSLogoSmall.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)