User talk:Gharjistan

Target killings of Hazara
This is a good start to Wikipedia, however I have had to remove one of your sources as it is not reliable. Please read WP:V and WP:RS, and welcome to Wikipedia. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Existing article
You probably haven't noticed, but there is already an article on target killings of the Hazara (see Persecution of Hazara people). How about merging your article into there?  Mar4d  ( talk ) 18:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Khan Sahab, already nominated his article for speedy deletion. Seems like he doesn't check his talk page at all. Hazara Birar  (Talk) 12:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The map of Hazarajat
I, personally, really appreciate your enthusiasm and work on the articles in Wikipedia specifically Hazara-related articles. Just a suggestion, if you want to bring major changes to the article, can you please first discuss it on the articles talk page? The reason, there are many wikipedians who might be working on them therefore a talk wouldn't hurt.

I will be undoing the the recent changes you have made to Hazarajat i.e I will remove the map of Hazarajat and replace it with the previous one.

You can discuss the issue Why do you want to replace the map on article's Talk page. Thanks Hazara Birar  (Talk) 11:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Target killings of Hazara


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Target killings of Hazara. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Persecution of Hazara people. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Persecution of Hazara people - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Hazara Birar (Talk) 12:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Persecution of Hazara people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Eid, ISI and Baloch


 * Hazara Town (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Chief of the Army Staff (Pakistan)


 * Target killings in Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Hazara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:AN/I discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. The discussion is here.--Shirt58 (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Please do not automatically revert the article Hazara people. Your changes are not well-sourced and are not in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Please discuss the changes you want to make. The current version is a well-sourced consensus-version. Thank you. --Lysozym (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Persecution of Hazara people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Pashtun and Khurasan


 * Abdul Rashid Dostum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Persian


 * Mohammad Mohaqiq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Persian


 * Quetta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Abrar Hussain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Persecution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic State of Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Stop
Gharjistan, in your reverts you are removing sourced and verified information and you are restoring unsourced, unverified information. You are putting sentences out there that are your own WP:OR and cannot be traced back to any sources. Please stop reverting. If you want to conduct changes, please enter them into the versions of the articles that have been stable for months and provide reliable secondary sources. I also would welcome if there was some exchange here or on the article's talk about the content, so we can discuss with the sources at hand. Thank you. Regards, JCAla (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I ask you again to discuss the content issue and present reliable sources, although I think you are a sock account. So please share your opinion with regards to the articles and to what you think needs to be changed or not. JCAla (talk) 09:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Hazaraboyz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Facts, not fiction (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Your recent editing history at Persecution of Hazara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Duncan What I Do / What I Say 09:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC)