User talk:Ghirschhorn

Speedy deletion of Logility
A tag has been placed on Logility, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, you've done a direct copy-and-paste of some of your company PR material, likely a copyright violation. Secondly, the existence of other supposedly similar articles is not a valid reason for keeping an article. Third, i2 is a NASDAQ-listed company, which makes it automatically notable by Wikipedia standards. Your company is not, as far as we can tell. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * (I restored this conversation so I could add to it.) I posted a new stub for Logility, since a NASDAQ listing makes it notable enough for an article. You can add to it, but please don't simply post company PR material — that's considered too promotional. Stuff like that gets zapped pretty quickly. Moreover, you need to click here to read up on Wikipedia's policies about conflicts of interest. TYou may have a problem here of you work for Logility or a PR firm hired by them.


 * You probably should leave discussions like this in place. If you delete them, some editors and admins might see this as an efoort to hide something, which is ultimately futile since Wikipedia keeps a full revision history. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Reference needed
In this edit you created a reference called "logility". Could you please provide the full link to this reference? I considered the possibility that it is the same http://www.logility.com/company/earnings-releases.cfm you edited there, but that page does not seem to contain such information. Debresser (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 19:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)