User talk:Ghmyrtle/Archive 11

DYK for British and Colonial Films
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Help !
I was in the process of putting together an article on Jeff Allen - drummer with Hello, East of Eden, Babe Ruth, Snowy White, Bonnie Tyler, Mick Taylor and Van Morrison etc. Or so I thought. However the timelines for Hello and East of Eden almost completely overlap, which set off alarm bells, and I was brought up short by this article, which omits mention of Hello. I think there might be two separate drummers from the same era with the same name, but which is which ? Allmusic here has seemingly led me astray. Mind you, I am easily led astray, my wife says so. It does not help that American Jeff Allen's appear in both sport and music, but I can tell these apart. The two British boys have been stumped. If there are two, which was born 23 April 1946, Matlock, Derbyshire, and which is the brother of Chris Cross ? What a bugger's muddle - can you shed any light ? Regards,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 20:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The problem as I see it is that there's this site called Wikipedia that puts up all sorts of "information" that's unreferenced and then gets copied verbatim by all sorts of other sites so that no-one knows what's actually true and what isn't. When I first saw the second picture here I thought, yes, he could be the same person as this.  But, apparently, he isn't - at least according to this - where Chris Cross of Ultravox  - originally Chris Allen - says that he is the brother of the Jeff Allen of Hello, who is now a postman in Harpenden, and who is not the same as the Jeff Allen of East of Eden.  Seems fairly definitive, but probably not strictly a WP:RS.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * PS: Where does Matlock come into it? Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The date and place of birth comes from Hello's article. As you have stated, this is also unreferenced, so could easily apply to either person (or maybe neither).  Actually, to be fair, even if it was "reliably sourced", it is easy to see how the two individual's have been muddled up.  I very nearly added to the mess (as per your first sentence). If the Matlock boy is Ultravox's brother (Chris Cross, 1952, Tottenham), then the family seemingly moved from the idylls of the Peak District to The Smoke within five/six years. Or not, as the case may be. Anyhow, I am somewhat closer than I was, so thanks again. On a completely separate issue, I see Norman Wisdom has died.... all together now; "Mr. Grimsdale..."
 * PS. I do not know if I'm back, back, in the "New York Groove", visiting "Vienna" or having a "Jig-a-Jig". Either way, it beats working for a living.
 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Soul forefathers
Note that the two wikipedia articles for Sam Cooke and Jackie Wilson provide plenty of citations for them being forefathers of Soul. However for the sake of elegance and brevity, I just included the links to those pages that indicate that Sam Cooke was known as the King of Soul and that Berry Gordy saw Jackie Wilson's voice as a template for his singer's. Including the citations to those two mentions would have been out of place without mentioning those elements within the article, but the articles themselves provide plenty of supporting evidence for the brief mention that the short preface to discussion of primary soul performers merits.71.102.14.207 (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation. However, I think that the guidance at WP:CITE still suggests that references should be cited in the Soul music article itself, even if it duplicates other articles.  The article - like many other music articles - is sorely lacking reliable references, particularly where statements are made which could easily be challenged.  Although I agree that both Wilson and Cooke were very important figures, I'm sure that others could come up with other names as well, and it's better to provide citations in such cases.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * as per WP:CITE its not likely that Sam Cooke and Jackie Wilson being mentioned as forefathers of Soul is likely to be challenged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.14.207 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not worth arguing over - my point is that any unreferenced statements are liable to be deleted - not by me, but possibly by others who may take a different view. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Sting thread
You deleted my comment. You probably didn't mean to, but there we are. --Viennese Waltz 09:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for reinstating it so speedily. --Viennese Waltz 09:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fred Evans (comedian)
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gillum.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gillum.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Kathy & Carol
Yes MOJO's got a lot to answer for! Nice work in expanding it. Good album, perhaps a little twee for my tastes but well worth hearing. I would suggest that a DYK tagline could read...did you know that Kathy & Carol released their sophomore album 45 years after their debut? yorkshiresky (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Good one. Personally I hate the word "sophomore", but I can see that in this context it makes sense.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

The Ramrods (punk band)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Ramrods (punk band), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Ramrods. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Ramrods (punk band)


The article The Ramrods (punk band) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references to show notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mark nutley (talk) 17:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give The Ramrods a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 06:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kathy and Carol
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 18:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Geography of Monmouthshire
Perhaps I'm being dim (?) but I haven't seen an article or indeed a section dealing with this topic - nor for that matter its geology. Knowing that you have an interest I wanted to learn your thoughts on the subject - certainly before I began work on anything. There would be merit in introducing a section within the Monmouthshire article though there's the question as to whether to refer principally to the historic county or the modern of course. cheers Geopersona (talk) 11:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that something should be done - ideally, sections in the articles on both the historic county and the modern local government area. As a comparison, there are sections in  both Glamorgan and Cardiff on Geography - there is also a brief section in Newport, but not in Blaenau Gwent or Torfaen.  I don't feel very motivated to launch into it myself at the moment, but I'll be happy to comment if you want to start something off.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Brenda Lee Eager
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

James Clark (physician)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of James Clark (physician), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cats/8/3290.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Lovely picture
That's a delightful photo of you on your user page. How old were you when it was taken? Don't worry I won't ask you the year.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * About 9-ish I should think. Just about the time this local band used to play down the road.  (And my age is no secret!)  Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you ever see them?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No - too young. Actually, I always thought they were massively lucky and over-rated.  Wings put on their first ever public show one lunchtime when I was at Nottingham University, but I couldn't be bothered to go along even though I was in the next building!  Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have the answer after reading your page. You said you were the first person in Exeter to buy the Sex Pistols LP; well, my ex-husband was the first person in his Dublin neighbourhood of Clontarf to buy a copy! It led to a falling-out between he and the dad of his best friend, who had bought himself a copy after listening to my husband playing it.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It was the single I bought the day it came out - by the time the album came out they were very passé! Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I had the LP. I saw a good punk band The Skids live in London back in 1980.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

renaming
Hi Ghmyrtle. In addition  to Cornwall,  you  may  wish  to quickly review the similar propositions made at Talk:Peterborough, Talk:Dover, Talk:Plymouth, Talk:Sydenham, Talk:Cambridge. I think the true reason for this sudden set of move proposals is insidious. --Kudpung (talk) 23:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Johnny Dyer
Thanks for the additional link you added. I was not sure that such a blatant commercial website was admissible, but I could not find an album review related website that cited the Muddy Waters connection, without trying to sell me a copy of it ! Cheers anyway,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You could take it out after it's gone through DYK....  Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

hi—just wanted to mention
I mentioned an edit that you made. It is no big deal, I don't think. But I just thought I should tell you that I mentioned you and your edit in another context. It is here. Bus stop (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lancaut
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 06:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Gregory Isaacs
You are right that the sources give his age at death as 59; but my records show that he was 60. Not worth worrying about - perhaps a lengthy definitive obituary might unearth more info.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 07:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dylan aust.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dylan aust.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Resolved - tagged as Standard-rationale

DYK for James Clark (physician)
The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joemorris.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Joemorris.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Cornwall Talk
See Talk:Constitutional_status_of_Cornwall, where some anon is addressing you directly. Outback the koala (talk) 19:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Frederick James Gould
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick James Gould, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cats/5/7166.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Frederick James Gould
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Frederick James Gould, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.ioe.ac.uk/services/625.html and http://www.leicestersecularsociety.org.uk/gould.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Frederick James Gould and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Frederick James Gould, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Frederick James Gould with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Frederick James Gould. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Frederick James Gould saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * While not a word-for-word copy, the article is a close paraphrase and needs to be rewritten further (preferably from scratch) in order to avoid infringing copyright. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Tobi Lark
-- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

A favour (another one)
Could I ask another favour of you. I presently have six articles at DYK. They are Dan Sane, James Armstrong (musician), Laura Smith (blues singer), Cash McCall (musician), Duke Henderson and Lottie Kimbrough. I am away at Cropton (in the pub in front of the brewery) from Friday to Monday 8 November inclusive. My birthday is the 6th, so it should be a bit of a do ! Could I prevail on you to keep an eye of these and, if possible, answer any queries that may arise on them. Ideally, I would not want to return home to find I am 'out of time' on any of them. No big deal, of course, and I apprecaite that you may well have better things to do. Many thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * As you are rapidly catching me up here perhaps I should be trying to thwart you - but I'm (usually) a nice person, so I won't. Have a good time!  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Frederick James Gould
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:24, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Celtic nations
Dab wrote:"If in doubt, just drop the flags. Or else present an unambiguous reference to the effect that each flag displayed is used to express each of the respective nationalisms." You wrote: "Your statement that 'Each flag displayed is used to express each of the respective nationalisms' is simply a statement of your opinion." This is a quotation from dab's post, so clearly you are replying to him. Sheodred wrote, directly under your post: "No it is not a statement of my opinion, and I refute that accusation". I replied that you were reponding to dab, not Sheodred. However, there was an edit conflict, so my post ended up in another section, not below Sheodred's reply to you. Sorry if that was unclear. Paul B (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Confusing indeed. Mind you this whole flag conversation is becoming increasingly bizarre and perhaps imposible. Paul B (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lloyd Morain
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

The Zombies
Oops, how could I have overlooked The Zombies with Colin Blunstone. The reason I had presumed Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple were less popular in the UK was that when I was in England in the mid-1970s most people didn't make such a big deal about them, whereas in the Staes they were HUGE. Along with Black Sabbath.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Albert Watts
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Watts (secularist)
The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Walk On By
What I mean is that the writers are not known as Bacharach and David. There is no Bacharach and David article as there is, say, Holland–Dozier–Holland or Lennon/McCartney. They are Burt Bacharach and Hal David, and the disambiguator should be full names. Where else are last names only used? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 17:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You provide a good example. However, Gilbert and Sullivan are well known as Gilbert and Sullivan. Maybe because Bacharach has had so much success on his own or with other writing partners besides Hal David, I never hear of Bacharach and David referred to as such, but as Burt Bacharach and Hal David. Although, I did notice there is the musical Back to Bacharach and David, which goes to your point of possibly needing an article for the team. Cheers. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Michel Esteban
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Wondrous Place
Can I ask you another favour. This song title may, or may not, have an 'A' before it. I did not think it did; the current Wiki article omits it; as does the British Hit Singles & Albums book (although to be fair, for brevity it probably would). It is not a big deal, except for about the third time in as many months, another editor insists of calling the song "A Wondrous Place", which rather makes a mess of the existing article and wikilinks thereto.

I like evidence such as this, but conversely still shudder about my "Need Your Love So Bad" experience. User:Peaksoft cites MCPS which may be perfectly valid too, but I am getting tired at this hour to explore further. Either way, it perhaps needs a third opinion. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Would you like to meet Jimmy Wales in Bristol 13th Jan 2011?
As you may have heard Jimmy Wales is coming to give a talk at the Victoria Rooms in Bristol on 13th January 2011 as part of wikipedia's 10th birthday celebrations. There is a possibility of a small group of local active wikipedians to meet him for 20 mins before the talk. If you are interested could you respond on the centralised discussion on the Bristol wikiproject talk page?&mdash; Rod talk 20:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Marie et les Garçons
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Wales

 * I'd like to add my thanks for your input and encouragement. It was invaluable. Daicaregos (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you - though it's only fair to say that my involvement has been minimal compared to others. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

The Monkees
I'm pleased to learn that the Monkees did actually sing on their records. There is another persistant urban myth surrounding The Monkees. It's the false claim that Charles Manson was one of those who had auditioned when they were casting The Monkees. In 1966, the time they were seeking actors for the programme, Manson was in jail! The myth persists, in spite of this fact.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, although Steve Stills did audition, but dropped out "partially because his already-thinning hair and bad teeth made him look too old for the part..." ! -   Stills recommended his former room-mate Peter Tork for the role.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Joeliggins.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joeliggins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Joe harriott.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joe harriott.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Running in the Family
Greetings from god's own country. My wife, who is investigating these things (à la Who Do You Think You Are?), informs me this afternoon that I had, wait for it .... a Great Grandma Fanny. Beat that !

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

United Kingdom
Howdy G. In future, if ya got a beef with my actions, bring it to my talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 06:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Chris Strachwitz
Hello! Your submission of Chris Strachwitz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Hedd Wyn
I did not appreciate being misrepresented by you yesterday. It may well be that I am wrong on this issue (although I am not convinced of it), but there is no call for you to be disingenuous in order to make a point. I am unsure whether your statement here that "… "Welsh literature" written within the UK - whether in Welsh or in English - is still "British literature"." is irrelavent to the discussion at Hedd Wyn or not. If so, perhaps you would care to strike it out, or amend it. Nevertheless, it is not irrelavent to ask why someone says something should be done in one way, yet chooses to do something themselves in another (must be a word for that; care to define it?). Please be kind enough to explain why Hedd Wyn should be noted as both Welsh and British because, in your view "in articles like this one, it is a neutral statement, and helpful to readers worldwide, to allude to the fact that Wales - as well as being a country in its own right - is part of the UK.", yet that 'neutral' statement, 'helpful to readers worldwide', was not mentioned when you created this page (and it still doesn't mention it). Nor is there any mention that " "Welsh literature" written within the UK - whether in Welsh or in English - is still "British literature" " on either the Welsh-language literature or the Welsh literature in English articles, both of which you have edited. Any chance of an explanation? Daicaregos (talk) 16:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You are the person who first alluded to Welsh literature - - not me, so I merely responded to you.  If you would like to improve the articles on Welsh literature, feel free to do so.  My intention at Hedd Wyn was simply to try to find a solution that both you and Varlaam could accept - I obviously failed.  C'est la vie - I won't be losing sleep over it.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Tell me, Ghmyrtle, could any genre be defined as Welsh, without also having to say British, in your opinion. Daicaregos (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * One film is not equivalent to a "genre". Where there is any potential for confusion (to a global, not necessarily very well-informed readership), I tend towards giving more information, rather than less.  But I recognise that the political / cultural message of that particular film makes that approach contentious to some.  We simply have different views as to where the neutral point of view lies, in that case.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I had thought it a direct question. Obviously, it did not deserve a direct answer. Please tell me, Ghmyrtle, could any thing be defined as Welsh on Wikipedia, without also having to say British, in your opinion. Daicaregos (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course. I'm really not interested in responding any further to your interrogation.  We have different views - it's no big deal.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bristol Festival of Ideas
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Chris Strachwitz
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you so much for creating the article on ZE Records' "A Christmas Record". A wikipedia article on the album has been long overdue. You did an excellent job!!! --Sliv812 (talk) 02:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

A Child's Christmas in Wales
Ta for the addition. I see you also have a possible Christmas DYK. Interesting article. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I had to double check that there hadn't already been an article on the Dylan Thomas work - it's amazing that there hadn't been! Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I was the same, there was a deleted article in 2006, which was just a cut and paste of the poem, so maybe that scared people off. Hope you find it an acceptable attempt, it really needs an expand on the style portion which I find week relying on a single source. FruitMonkey (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lincoln Chase
Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for A Christmas Record
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Johnny-Copeland.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Johnny-Copeland.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Happy happy
Happy new year, Guy! Thanks for all the sources and help you provided for the articles I initiated. ~ Elitropia (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hyperion
Yes, that's the one. Well done Ghmyrtle. Have you read it? Fred DeSoya (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Astronauts (band)
Thanks from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 02:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Now, I know it's not a race, but... I make this your 79 DYK, one ahead of myself :). At the rate of DYKs you are posting recently I think you will nab that 100 badge before me. Then again the new rule coming in will slow a few people down, myself included. Congrats. FruitMonkey (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. I only make it 73, unless you're counting nominations as well as creations/expansions. Anyway, it's one of my new year resolutions to slow down, if not stop completely!  Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Blues
Not my style of doing things, but hey... I'll be back in a couple of days, so I hope any discussion stays amicable between now and then. Happy new year. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * No reason for it not to be amicable. I don't take offence easily. Though, reverting has never been my favourite form of editing. I've restored to the correct use of the term as the reason given for reverting is not neccessary. See Don't revert due to "no consensus", and also Reverting. The blues is the form that appears to be widely used when discussing the blues. I did a little research before making the move, and I also checked back in the archives to see if this had previously been discussed. It looks to me as though "blues" has been used as the title incorrectly, and others reading the article have simply assumed that the person naming it "blues" did so because there was a valid reason which they didn't know about. If there are valid reasons for calling it "blues" then it would be worth presenting them so a discussion can take place.  SilkTork  *YES! 18:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)