User talk:Ghmyrtle/Archive 24

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Feeling Good
Hello there, what's wrong with my last edit of feeling good ? Forgoodnice (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll reply on the talk page. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:W P Brookes.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:W P Brookes.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

king
sorry and will do mate. bit of a sore point that the age is accurate for very personal reasons. Thanks mate.(Dave006 (talk) 10:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)).
 * Can you help please mate, My brother had an account trfc06, he was blocked, but even he is eligible to have a new account I believe as long as he follows the rules? I am no sock puppet, what do I do re this now please? I have broke no rules and am editing only as allowed Thanks(Dave006 (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)  In fact I think my wife and at least one son have accounts at this ip address as well, dont think they are active though?  PS dont suppose your a tranmere fan from you days on the Wirral??
 * I suggest you go to Sockpuppet investigations/Trfc06 and make your comments there. "My brother did it" is the oldest excuse in the book.  And yes, we do have a common interest.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

lol, I do have a family you know, 9 in this house, its quite big, dont worry. I will read that, thanks a lot. Good to find a tranmere fan, not many about! Who do you follow now where you live? (Dave006 (talk) 16:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC))

Copy of my answer to a message on the Jonathan King talk page - I see you're involved in editing it..... I see you've reversed all my edits so I assume you and the other editors are not interested in my contributions. I have no problem with that. The graduation date is clearly in Music Week (which was then Record Retailer) and all the other music papers; I was looking at Record Mirror which has a picture caption which says on Friday 23rd June 1967 "Jonathan King BA attends an awards ceremony at Cambridge University where he receives his honours degree in English - then rushes to Southampton to co-compere As You Like It" whatever that might be. Sorry if that doesn't meet your rules or agenda. LudoVicar (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

And my sign off... I notice you have had other sock puppets editing on both sides. Good luck to you. My talk page comments...


 * I had no idea it would be such a minefield trying to edit an article. I'd not tried before and only fiddled with details although even then my edits were reverted. I won't bother again. To answer the editor who considers me a sock puppet, lovely words, just let me repeat why I made some of the small changes to the lead (thank heavens I didn't waste time doing more). I thought his first hit sold in several countries but will bow to your research that it only sold in two countries though even there I can't quite see why it needs saying. I assume all other wiki entries on other singers specify similar. I find "string" of releases and "novelty" records odd words to use in a factual encyclopedia but bow to superior literacy. I assume the 4 hits "in the 70s" avoid his productions or those which don't feature his vocals although, again, I can't work out why the 70s are specifically singled out unless it's to remove his 60s and 80s productions and cant see why it deserves mention anyway. Basic research shows he discovered Genesis and produced them independently long before placing them with Decca or even leaving university. Why he is described as "working for" companies he didn't work for and those companies that released his other independent releases are ignored I cannot understand. It's not even negative to him. It's just wrong. I would have thought any editor with a Book of Hit Singles could have verified that, or is that not online? I bow to superior editing experience that 10cc were far more significant than his Rocky Horror Show or other acts. I believed Wikipedia was meant to state facts and not opinions on quality or significance. He never presented Top of the Pops as far as I remember but was on every month doing a US chart rundown but I certainly won't be checking my old music magazines to find proof. And I quite understand that his Old Bailey convictions are a far better story than his acquittal and as such deserve mention in the lead if wikipedia is meant to be a tabloid site. As for further details lower down the article, I wont bother reading or checking as my changes - even if sources detailed and provided - would be bulk reverted by editors wanting a more accurate article. I'm sorry, I just dont have time to bother scanning magazine pages into e mail. I apologize if my edits are similar to anyone else's but I'm nobody's sock puppet and wouldnt dream of accusing any other editor of being one either although that appears to be the default position. As I leave I would suggest any editor genuinely wanting an accurate article gets his autobiography and finds confirmation or proof of lying for any significant facts, as I would suggest they should do for any person warranting an article on Wikipedia, if they really want to contribute properly. Finally might I politely comment that certain editors might think about developing good manners and not bulk erasing changes, made in good faith, or chucking accusations of vandalism about? People in glass houses...LudoVicar (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

george donnely
i mate, can you help please, are these good sources to update his records?

heres one link: http://www.osadvertiser.co.uk/west-lancashire-sport/skelmersdale-united/2009/03/12/skelmersdale-united-striker-george-donnelly-signs-for-plymouth-argyle-80904-23132046/

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/other-sport/amateur-sport/skelmersdale-united-marksman-george-donnelly-3456844

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/p/plymouth_argyle/7940167.stm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave006 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * They look OK to me. Please try and remember to sign posts on talk pages with four of these: ~  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Don't drop the soap
Here is a piece of Jimmy Savile memorabilia which may be hard to sell today. There are other similar items available on Amazon.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 15:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, nice commpany name. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC) ... should fit in my collection very nicely
 * This is still available though. Some of the customer reviews might amuse you.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

WPMOS listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WPMOS. Since you had some involvement with the WPMOS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg (chat) 02:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Liverpolitan
Hey, I noticed your edit on this can you explain as I have never heard of it ? I put an edit on the talk page Babydoll9799 (talk) 11:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Former heading needs to be returned to garage rock article and previous Characteristics section restored to former state
Someone altered the former heading to the garage rock section, which had read:


 * Garage rock is a raw form of rock and roll that was first popular in the United States and Canada from about 1963 to 1967. During the 1960s, it was not recognized as a separate music genre and had no specific name. In the 1970s, some critics referred to the style as punk rock, the first form of music to bear this description; although it is sometimes called garage punk, protopunk, or 1960s punk, the style has predominantly been referred to as garage rock.

Some of the new contents added had previously appeared in the "Characteristics" section of the article, which was a better place for them. The new changes make the heading unnecessarily verbose and deprive it of the conciseness needed for a good introduction. It now begins by discussing things that are not as primary as what was once stated clearly in the beginning. These new contents should be moved back to the "Characteristics" section of the article. I think that we should return article to its former configuration, albeit with any true improvements that would make it better. One change: "60s punk" is the most often used term (not "1960s punk"). Thanks. Garagepunk66 (talk) 19:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * So why ask me? Raise it on the article talk page, or - if you want to personalise it - raise it with User:Sabrebd who made those changes (and for whom, incidentally, I have the greatest respect).  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

I share your same respect for the editor of which you speak. But, no one is infallible. Large changes such as these should be made by consensus, not unilaterally (even by a highly regarded editor), and I have not seen any discussion threads on the talk page to solicit opinions of other editors on the matter. I will try to contact that editor. I should not have to be the one to put it onto the talk page myself, because no one ever asked me or anyone else's viewpoints on this. With that in mind I should certainly have every right to undo it and return it to its former configuration (for at least the time being). Then we can all have a discussion on the talk page about how to improve the configuration of the article. I think that would be the best and most appropriate way to proceed. Garagepunk66 (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You should raise it on the article talk page first. If the edit was contentious to anyone but yourself, others would have raised it already.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

I have entered the thread on the Talk page as you recommended. Please read it and consider its merits. I do a much better job explaining the reasons there than what I wrote above. Thanks. Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making the improvements in the heading. And I do acknowledge gratitude to SabreBD for making a first attempt to bring the heading into accordance with the guidelines.  I think the article is now on the right track.  I would like to add some parts about Hispanic bands in East LA and the numerous all-female bands of the time, such as The Pleasure Seekers and The Luv'd ones (based on reliable sources).  Garagepunk66 (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

UK Records
I had looked for something on the label, but came up with very little. What do you make of this? I wasn't too sure of it because of the rather over-the-top praise of the label fouder in a couple of places and it got the year of Paloma Blanca wrong. But there is useful background there. DeCausa (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not a book that I know, but Dave Thompson (a sadly unsourced article) is a reasonably well-known writer and it would seem to me to be fairly reliable. More info on him here and here.  Good find!  Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Saw your addition - where did you get the page numbers from? I couldn't find the print edition on Google books and e-book editions don't have pzge numbers. I've always been puzzled as to how to cite ebooks without page numbers. Is there a way of getting them from the e-book edition that I'm (stupidly) unaware of? DeCausa (talk) 08:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I used this tool - which I confess I've never used before but looks useful. When you put in the url, it comes up with the page number, even though there is no number visible on the page itself.  At least, that's what I think it does - it certainly fills in the page number box in the template.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Learnt something useful this morning! DeCausa (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Your recent editing history at Jimmy Savile shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --The Totter 03:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Removed as inappropriate. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

The Flower Pot Men
A bit of a long shot. Could you investigate one Pete Nelson (born Peter Lipscomb). I think it might be Peter William Lipscomb, born 10 March 1943, Uxbridge, London; died October 2005, Ealing, London. Perhaps your skills might find something more definitive than that listed in the above article.

On an unrelated matter, do you think any of The Dale Sisters, aka The England Sisters (ie. Betty, Julie and Hazel Dunderdale) are traceable ? This may help, or hinder; or this.

You probably have better things to do. As should I, at my age - like watching England in Australia maybe ? Doh - don't ask, although Australia was rather splendid. We travelled to Perth, Melbourne, Sydney, Airlie Beach and Port Douglas. Hope you are well. Regards,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hmm. The General Register Office list of deaths (at Ancestry.com) certainly brings up Peter William Lipscomb, born 10 March 1943, died Oct 2005.  Whether that is the Peter Lipscomb aka Nelson, I don't know, but it seems likely.
 * The same site gives me Hazel Dunderdale, born in Goole, 1942 3rd qtr (July-Sept), mother's maiden name Best. And, in the same family, same mother, also in Goole - Elizabeth Dunderdale, b. 1939 4th qtr, and Julie Dunderdale, b. 1941 2nd qtr.  Also two brothers, Gilbert (b.1929) and Brian (b.1938).  Hazel married David Read in 1965.  Julie married Roy Coldwell in 1968.  Not sure about Elizabeth - there's more than one possibility.  Nothing other than that - apart from the obvious Patrick Moore connection of course...  And this.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you, old bean. I have milked The Dale Sisters for all they are worth, making their recorded output of four singles from well over 50 years ago sound as if they were on a par with "Hey Joe", "Smells Like Teen Spirit" or even "What Do You Want?".  Either way, those old dears are almost from 'my neck of the woods'.  I have been bold on Mr. Lipscomb, or possibly  transgressed No original research.  As if I care.  Many thanks for the input; if you find yourself at the Old Bailey, I am the 'learned pop historian, who would have been present, but found himself otherwise engaged ruminating at the boundary rope at some cricket match or another'.


 * Anyhoo, what obvious Patrick Moore connection ?? I won't sleep.


 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 01:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This - and plenty of online forums - claim that Moore plays xylophone on the record. Unfortunately, I've yet to find a reliable source for the claim.  :-(    Did you flick back through those flickr photos?  The tour was compered by (the allegedly 23-year-old) Dave Allen, interestingly.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Rather like Bob Holness played the saxophone on "Baker Street" ?! Dave Allen was born in July 1936, so he would have been 23 years old in 1959/1960. I am not very good at Flickr (or anything else for that matter). For mere interests sake, does it say where those cuttings originated from ? Cheers,


 * Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It's the tour programme for "the fabulous young recording star" Helen Shapiro, in 1961. (Woopah, oh yeah yeah).  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your comment re: Anglo-Saxon
Thanks for your comment. In making comment could I suggest, that you consider the effort that people are putting in to make particular articles, that are devoid of detailed content, better. I am sure you didnt mean it to sound like you prefered the previous version of this page, and wished I wasn't bothering. Having said this, I appreciate your work in correcting my typos/grammar errors. J Beake (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If I had preferred the previous version I would have reverted you, or at least raised concerns on the talk page. I do appreciate the work you're putting in.  But it would be even better if your words were grammatical and spelled correctly.  Saving a word like "Merican" is, at best, sloppy.  Do you preview your edits?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Point taken. More previews before pressing. However, I am not sure you got my point about how you come across. I will make sure the fairies don't take over my keyboard, or in trying to get over complex points, I don't strain the bounds of grammar. By the way, smile for me.J Beake (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, but, please believe me, I am a paragon of civility and rectitude compared with some you might run across on this site! Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Lucky Numbers!
Congratulations on 7 years, 7 months, and 7 days on the website! -- Mets fre ak  (Hello!) 03:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Help
As a recent editor on George Martin - can you help? Google him and it says Wikipedia says he was born in prison. Yet on Wiki it's not. Can you correct the Google info? I don't know how to.78:45:33rpm (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Can I help? No.  It must have been some vandalism picked up by a Google web crawler.  Nothing that anyone other than Google can fix.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Edit war
Please do not template the regulars. Paul B (talk) 12:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If they are edit warring, they deserve it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Baloney. However, I am perfectly happy to take this matter to the reliable sources board. Paul B (talk) 12:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Go for it. But, if you look at the issue with a cooler head, you may well conclude that it's perfectly possible to come up with a form of words that would be acceptable to all.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Recent creation
Ummmm... dealing in "Sexual Healing", I notice. No good will come of this - you will end up walking with a limp. Dear old Marvin, Ostend and Bruges are close to my heart. Good effort, dear boy.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Do not follow me around auto-removing removing my edits.
Please do not stalk me, and automatically revert my edits Ghmytle. That is what you are doing as far as I am concerned. '''I find it distressing. '''Why not see if someone else wants to (ie but not Dai)? You do not own these ares. Matt Lewis (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please go to the article talk page, explain why you made those edits, and see if others agree with you. I have 7,717 pages on my watchlist; it's unsurprising that we overlap.  People who find editing here "distressing" should perhaps find an alternative hobby.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Please lets cool down mate. I work 24/7 and am a bit het up. Please read my comment (I've just made it) I'm in a hurry and have to go though. It was a fantastic edit that I made, even if i say so myself! I took me time. Matt Lewis (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Small
But at least you're not a troll, eh? Great to see lively and informed debate, isn't it. But then I don't work 24/7, alas. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hey lively, I'm siting at my PC checking my watchlist. Sitting not far from of me, still up, is the lady I care for. I care for her '24/7' because at any point of the day she can suddenly need attention. I am with her all hours. Some days she needs attention all day long, and in the hours of darkness I'm cleaning something unpleasant off the floor. Whenever she stirs and rises I hear her, and I'm up and I'm there. I've been up to 6 months without a days break from it. When I do get a day off (and I really don't get many) it is never for 24 hours. And do you know what? I don't care because, I'm happy doing what I'm doing. I said I was 24/7 (was it at the ANI?) only to explain how I have to leave to notebook sometimes, ie just stop and leave it for whatever length of time it takes. No sob story - why would I? Just the time scale. I didn't even think for a second that it would sound like bullshit, but that's probably just because I'm so used to doing it. It's just life for me. We are actually out an about a lot and have some really good times too.


 * You went one way then very-suddenly the other on Wales_talk directly after about 10 clear gnomic-style trollings. What did you expect me to say to you? How wonderfully funny you are? Don't you ever troll me again sunshine, because I really don't appreciate what you just said. It was a stupid gamble actually, and it shows you to be the donut I started to suspect you were. Matt Lewis (talk) 01:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing to do with me, I think... ?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Quite. Sincere apologies, Ghm, for besmirching your Talk Page will "troll-like comments". Martinevans123 (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Fol-de-rol. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Ghm. How dare you. Anyone might think you had a sense of humour. Just you watch your step, sonny-jim-my-wee-laddy, or it's ANI for you, make no mistake. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * God, do you have ADHD or something? Nobody's threatening an ANI. In playing with and reverting my own comments Daicaregos gave me no choice about that - I never do things like that normally. This is why you need to delete (or maybe hand-archive?) this kind of thing ghmyrtle. I know why you don't like to do that, but whatever you ask of me I'm not going to let him say something like that and he knows it. I don't give a toss where his constant links lead to either: it just looks like I've been threatening to do something like that to me. Claiming I don't have a sense of humour is basically all he's got left to say. Fine: It's true - I don't with you any more. So now you've said that can you please tell yourself you've now had your fill? Thanks. Matt Lewis (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Gave you no choice? Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahah! Perleeze. Daicaregos (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You kept reverting back my own deleted comment on a talk page. I deleted it for a reason, but you didn't want to know. You can't do that. Even Ghmyrtle told you that, then me, then someone else, then an admin. Yet you still took it to 3RR - because you know you can get away with murder. I swear you people think you do anything in this place. It's as bad here now as it ever was. You may not like my mouth sometimes (and you certainly do not like my normative non-nationalist politics), but my actions are all per policy, and always have been. Matt Lewis (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

My edit
As long as you approve, I am content. Cheers Guy! — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 17:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

David John Pearson
I don't know what the response time should be and what other routes may be open. I suppose it could be raised at one of the general help forums in the hope that it would be directed in the appropriate direction. Do you want me to do this? Bear in mind that I don't have a great deal of experience in this, but I will support any AfD that you might propose. JMcC (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

you have just regurgitated incorrect information
Your post of Frank Sardo (Avianca) list him as born in Brooklyn. this is false. he was in reality born in Sicily. He would be insulted that this mistake was passed on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.214.2.118 (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message - I'll discuss it over at the article talk page. Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Changes at Rapping
Hi - I do not want an editwar so I will tell you the problem I saw here and why I moved it. The source is fine, but the way it is set up now is that it implies this was an influence on Gil Scott Heron. The prior sentence says "he was influenced by...", so having this sentence begin "Another influence.." implies Scott-Heron, but there is nothing in those sources about him at all. Do you see why I moved it? You can move it another way if you like to, it's a good source, just placed confusingly. ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * One of the problems with your wording was that - as well as removing any reference to Moore having any influence - you left an ungrammatical sentence. As a compromise, I'll just tweak your sentence to correct the grammar, remove the specific reference to Dolemite (which it could be argued isn't supported by the source), and leave it at that.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Perfect! Thank you, sorry about the grammatical problem, it looked ok at the hour I made the change! ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 20:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Anjem Choudary
I strongly advise you to not get involved in the Anjem Choudary debate. I have requested page protection, and am in the process of requesting Arbitration. If you want to be included in the Arbitration, keep reverting my edits, and I will include you. You have been advised. Atsme (talk) 09:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm grateful for your advice. I strongly advise you to abide by WP guidance, stop edit warring, and stop making threats like the one above.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Lokalkosmopolit (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I'd be perfectly happy to work up a compromise wording if I had the remotest idea that anyone would take any notice. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

John Macleod (songwriter) ‎
Do I assume that you, like me, had no luck finding birth details for Mr Macleod ? He must be approaching his eighties now - indeed, I presume he is still alive.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * He was certainly born before 1928 - this obit of his sister Marion Pertwee (Bill's wife), born 1928, refers to him as her elder brother. If he was indeed born in Canada (I'm not 100% sure), their birth records are not public for, I think, 100 years.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Guitar Gable
Can I just doubly check with you that said Guitar Gable (Gabriel Perrodin) did not reach the US R&B chart, logically between 1956 and 1959 (with or without his Musical Kings and/or King Karl) ? Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:10, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Not so much as a sniff of chart action, I'm afraid... Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * His article is now up and running. Cheers, - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Turning raga into reggae
This gave me a chuckle.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)