User talk:GhostDraggin

Welcome!
Hello, GhostDraggin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Manka Dhingra, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ryanharmany (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Manka Dhingra


A tag has been placed on Manka Dhingra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ryanharmany (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manka Dhingra


A tag has been placed on Manka Dhingra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  FITINDIA  21:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manka Dhingra


A tag has been placed on Manka Dhingra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 18:02, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I will sort my arguments into 4 categories, related to the 4 accusations

WP:MEAT
We do have similar ideals, but Heterozygus did not recruit me to argue for his opinions. We are each separate entities, and make our own arguments.

WP:COI
I am not any more biased than any other wikipedian. Yes, I do support one candidate, but who doesn't? I still strive to present an unbiased opinion. In fact, I only noticed this block as I was trying to create an overarching article for the WA State special election, referenced in the Jinyoung Englund Deletion page.

WP:PAID
I am not paid, I am a volunteer, and I act of my on volition

WP:PROMO
As I mentioned under WP:COI I am committed to keeping wikipedia unbiased, and am only working towards raising awareness towards both candidates and their policies

Apologies if I am in the wrong here, I just figured that given my direct knowledge of the election, I could contribute. | decline = Regarding WP:MEAT: Based on the checkuser confirmation, admission to working on a campaign, and shared interests, it seems more probable than not that there is some form of collaboration. Arbcom has established that "when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets." This precedent was set in 2005. Regarding WP:COI: That's inaccurate - editors affiliated with organizations, groups, etc. are specifically advised not to edit pages related to them, and undisclosed COI editing is grounds for sanctions. There is a specific section in our policy entitled WP:COI is not simply bias, and I recommend that you read it. (It is clearly not a coincidence that you nominated the page on Jinyoung Englund, Dhingra's opponent, for deletion.) Regarding WP:PAID: Fair enough, but one need not be paid to have a COI. Regarding WP:PROMO: FWIW, Manka Dhingra did have something of a promotional flavor to it. GABgab 00:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)}}