User talk:GhostInTheMachine/WHH

Edith Maud Ellis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Edith Maud Ellis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  21:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wrea Head Hall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wrea Head Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wrea Head Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MrClog (talk) 17:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse question
Just letting you know that I responded to your question at the Teahouse. If you think the closing admin has not closed the AFD according to consensus, you'll want to open up a discussion at WP:DRV.  bibliomaniac 1  5  21:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)