User talk:Ghostexorcist/Archive 6

SDCC MMOG
The link for the page? Well, it's gone now, so I can't really give you one. It was under the games section in Avatar... Mew Mitsuki (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  02:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Keyblade
Actually, I warned Keyblade before he made his fourth revert. In an edit summary. He just brushed it off. Rau's Speak Page 22:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yo. I didn't use the "undo" thing for that- I edited the page like normal. Isn't that warning only for if you do undo? Not if you just do it normally? Keyblade Mage (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage
 * Ah, to the letter. Even though I'm certain thats against policy. It's in the lead. Rau's Speak Page 23:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

You guys just wanna put today behind us, and just be duddies? Whaddaya say? Keyblade Mage (talk) 00:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Keyblade Mage

List of Avatar episodes Season 1
Hey, I just went and copyedited the summaries in the Season 1 list, as I am hoping to bring that up to FL as well. However, since I am absolutely useless at coloring syntaxes, would you mind re-coloring the DVD volume sales to match with the style used in the main "List of episodes" article? I would appreciate it greatly. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, would you also do the same with Season 2 and Season 3 ? I'm working on copyediting those lists as well. --haha169 (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks anyway. Rau J fixed the coloring syntax. :) Would you mind fixing up random tidbits on the season articles? I think that they are soon to be ready for FLC, especially in comparison with this. --haha169 (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

91.0.246.65
This person is quite beligerant. None the less, he does seem to have a point, the image he provided does not mention the CNSO, or any other orchestra. It does mention the London choir, so maybe he is onto something there. Have you taken any action against him yet? What should we do in regards to the article? --Simpsons fan 66 08:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Appearances section for Son Goku
Aren't you gonna do anything? If not, I'd rather bring the old section back. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Just bring it back for right now. I'll whip something up later. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique [ approves | this | message  ] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Cuju
Hello. I responded on the talk page. Note that I merely moved the part to the bottom, and did not remove it altogether. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine. As long as it's mentioned. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 12:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Lau Gar
Whilst I understand you've edited some of the Lau gar page, I think you've been overly brutal in your edits. If you look at the sources on it compared to others, you'll see that alot of the more esoteric arts are scant on proper published sources - for obvious reasons. Just look at the choy gar page for example.

Do you have alot of experience in chinese martial arts? as I'm a little confused of your choices in what to remove. The section about the "lau gar" forms in hung gar is a very widely regonised fact, and is also VERY helpful for disambiguity between lau gar in hung gar, and lau gar proper. also you've left things that now don't make sense as you've removed sections but not changed the preceding paragraph so it reads "There are three different styles of Kung Fu that use the name Lau Gar:" but only two are listed. You've also removed the link to the newspaper article about Xiao Yong Ding which is an extremely useful source of info - though sadly in chinese... (what is the procedure for foreign language links?)

The list of forms in UK lau gar is quite handy too. Not sure why it's been removed, yes it's an uncited source but then so are the list of forms on other pages.

As for the controvsery section - i feel it IS important. whilst forums might not be reliable, they are useful for commentry. It's quite clear that the lack of evidence for jeremy yau claim has not gone unnoticed. Nor has the similarities between the second form in lau gar (jurn sau) and the first form in wing chun. If you are unhappy with forums, can we at least keep the bey logan comment?

Finally - Perhaps if we can't use forum/youtube links as source (though in the latter, it's quite clear from the comentry that it is Xiao Yong Ding perfomring) we can link them as external links? It seems a shame to not show footage of the art itself.

Fair use rationale for Image:301964.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:301964.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Was given rational. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

did I mention...?
...did I mention this? Ling.Nut (talk&mdash;WP:3IAR) 13:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pk 071n.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pk 071n.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I originally added a rational for the wrong article. I fixed it. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:301964.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:301964.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The image already has a rational. I'm confused to why it was tagged. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:301964.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:301964.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It has a rational already. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Chaquan
The article on Muslim Chinese martial arts attributes this martial art to a Muslim named Zhamir, and this form being exclusively most Muslim style, other sources including Changquan, http://www.northernshaolinmontreal.com/en/system.html , http://www.atlantamartialarts.com/styles/chaquan.htm say otherwise, since this information is not sourced, would be ok to delete Zhaquan off of the Muslim Chinese martial arts article as original research? Abstrakt (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Protection
But is it not protected anymore? If so, he only needed to say that. *SIGN* 22:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll ask. *SIGN* 23:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

my english is not verey good so i will be glad if you corrected some of my mistakes in that page --Bayrak (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zhoupic3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zhoupic3.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Message
First Crusade has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. OpenSeven (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:S1487657.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:S1487657.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Massive Chinese Jews Book
Hi, Ghost!

I just received your message. Unfortunately, the book is now selling for 124 dollars. Thanks for watching out for it, though. :)

Yodaat (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Cotton
Now that you mention it, I have included some information about cotton in one of my articles:


 * Tang Dynasty

Using this source:


 * Adshead, S.A.M. (2004). T'ang China: The Rise of the East in World History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1403934568 (hardback).

Although he did not have much to say about the topic. I'll check indexes shortly; right now at this moment, I'm compiling notes from:


 * Sun, Xiaochun and Jacob Kistemaker. (1997). The Chinese Sky During the Han: Constellating Stars and Society. Leiden, New York, Köln: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 9004107371.

...at one of my sandboxes, User:PericlesofAthens/Sandbox5, for rewriting the Han Dynasty article.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 20:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Great, and it's good to hear your work is coming along. Although I'm busy with real life concerns, all my Wiki energies are now consumed by the Han Dynasty project, which I had aimed to complete by the end of the summer but things just got in the way. My goal is to finish the Han Dynasty completely before 2008 is done.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 22:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I did see that question, but I couldn't answer it so I didn't say anything...I don't know where to look or who to ask. I searched the library for something appropriate and came up with "Studies on the Levantine trade in the Middle Ages", a Variorum collection of articles by Eliyahu Ashtor, which contains "The Venetian cotton trade in Syria in the later Middle Ages." Venice of course would have been trading with the Muslims. It's a little old (1978) but hopefully it's a start. Adam Bishop (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Aang and Katara
Hey there. I was hoping to start up a discussion on the edits which you've labeled as "shipping" and removed. Can you post here a little more detail why you feel my additions were "Shipping"? NuclearWarfare  contact me My work 20:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey there. I had responded to your post on my talk page, but you still reverted my edits :( Can you please respond to them? NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  19:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Explanation
You wrote [this is an edit comment recently. "Why don't you make an effort to find a better source than just to delete the thing altogether next time. It took me all of one second to find one"

I didn't "just delete the thing altogether" -- I deleted the part that HAD to be deleted and left a tag so people would know to look for it. You might as well say why does anyone just tag anything when they could do it themselves... There are multiple steps involved in making any improvements, and it's odd to complain when someone doesn't do all of them. In this case that site was listed on a ton of articles and I made the effort to remove it from all the places it was. That's more than a little effort. Was I supposed to take the effort to redo sources on all the articles for all the topics? If you didn't know about that end of it, that's understandable, but leaving an odd edit comment isn't particularly helpful. DreamGuy (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Aang and Katara
It appears that there was number consensus here. Though I was not initially comfortable with the idea, I'm copacetic with the decision ATM. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File:0365.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:0365.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. J Milburn (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Shaolin-soccer-comic-2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Shaolin-soccer-comic-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

RE: Zhou Tong
Hey, this is great news - the new pic is brilliant. Glad I was able to help! --Dave the Rave (DTR) talk 11:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

re: looking for info for an essay
I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I don't know of an English translation of Tang Hao's work or of the Yi Jin Jing itself.

As for Brian Kennedy, his Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals touches on Tang Hao's work on the Yi Jin Jing and is widely available. (I've seen it in Barnes & Noble and Borders.)

Kennedy seems to publish regularly in Classical Fighting Arts and has also had several articles published in the Journal of Asian Martial Arts.

Also, the dubious nature of the Yi Jin Jing was suspected as early as the 18th century by Ling Tingkan (Shahar, p. 168).

Best of luck!

JFD (talk) 17:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

It's the Ghostman!
Hey bromosexual. Hah! What's going on man? Take a look at this shit:


 * Economy of the Han Dynasty
 * Government of the Han Dynasty
 * History of the Han Dynasty
 * Science and technology of the Han Dynasty
 * Society and culture of the Han Dynasty

I'm having a hard time deciding which one I like the most. In the end, once I rewrite the main Han Dynasty article, that one may very well be the best, since it will be the most comprehensive and incorporate the best aspects of all these articles.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 08:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, keep in mind, I've been working on this project since last summer. It was in the making for quite a while and is only now coming to fruition. About the email, I checked my inbox, and I don't see any new mail from you. Care to send it again?-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 22:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Look what I did to Han Dynasty; it's got that new car smell now! Lol.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 01:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Still around, bro?-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 02:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's an excellent image you have there. I'll consider placing it in one of the Song articles, perhaps Society of the Song Dynasty under the foreign minorities section.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 23:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, do you think it should replace the synagogue picture already positioned inside that article section? I rather like the synagogue picture, but do you think this image should take its place? Perhaps there's another article I could use this image instead...-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 23:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough; I'll switch pictures. I like both of them, but I have to agree, the arc one is less cluttered in appearance.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 01:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Bolding Kaifeng, Jerusalem
Hi Ghostexorcist,

Greetings! I hope your spring season has gotten off to a very productive and fruitful start. I was just wondering, did you object to me bolding Kaifeng, Jerusalem, or putting quotes around it? Please let me know! Thanks.

64.231.75.101 (talk) 01:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually never mind, it was the bolding. Not the quotes. I get it. No need to respond to my earlier inquiry. Thanks.

Albert Cheng (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I just got your last message. Thank you very much for giving me the information you had about the research being done on the Kaifeng Jewish descendants' DNA.

Albert Cheng (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)