User talk:Ghurkin

Speedy deletion of Hullcitymad
A tag has been placed on Hullcitymad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ''' Bushcarrot  Talk Please Sign! ''' 14:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Hull City A.F.C., even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 15:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hull City A.F.C.. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Oxymoron83 15:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring on Hull City A.F.C.‎
Ghurkin, you've now reverted 4 different editors, technically violating the WP:3RR rule. Please read that before reverting again, as it could get your account blocked.

The reason this information is being removed is because it violates the external link policy, is not verifiable from reliable sources, and is not encyclopedic. --barneca (talk) 15:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)