User talk:GianlucaMolla

Welcome
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 13:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isoalloxazine ring
Hello GianlucaMolla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Isoalloxazine ring for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josh1024 (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isoalloxazine
Hello GianlucaMolla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Isoalloxazine for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josh1024 (talk) 13:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

RE: Speedy deletion nomination of Isoalloxazine
Hi Gianluca,

I marked your articles for deletion because of how short they are but also because you seem to have created two articles about the same thing (Isoalloxazine and Isoalloxazine ring). I am no expert on either of these things but obviously duplicate articles can't be created (these two articles seem the same). I will withdraw my speedy deletion for Isoalloxazine because it does seem a genuine thing but obviously the article needs a lot of work, but if you just busy now and can work on the article later I will just tag it so that it can be shown that the article needs work. The specific problems with the article are WP:VERIFY and possibly WP:ORIGINAL and WP:NOTE.

Josh1024 (talk) 13:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Update: Between writing a reply to your comment on my talk page your article, Isoalloxazine, was deleted by an admin. I suggest you create the article again when you have more time so that its less likely to be marked for speedy deletion, since your article seemed to actually have some basis and I'm sure would be a great addition to Wikipedia. Josh1024 (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)