User talk:Giannavozzolo

March 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mary Harron, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 18:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  22:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Harron. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please discuss on the article's talk page; multiple editors have removed your insertions (which also seem mostly just cut/paste text from the source) Zim Zala Bim  talk 18:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- VViking Talk Edits 19:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mary Harron. Zim Zala Bim talk 22:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)