User talk:Giannova.r

Unblock
{{unblock-spamun|giannova.ryandanny|Well i just join on wikipedia, and i spent a whole day to create an original content and good citation, if i do any wrong please help to guide me to edit the better article, so it will not look like a spammy and advertising link. thank you--Giannova.r (talk) 08:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)} }}
 * You are not blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The leaf jimbaran
Hello Giannova.r,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The leaf jimbaran for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. Note that your account is not blocked. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Al though you gave references, some do not meet those criteria
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * NIRMALA GROUP (PT. KARYA NIRMALA UTAMA) ... THE LEAF JIMBARAN  shouty spam capitals
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  concept is healthy lifestyle objective, given a boost with a myriad of options – eat, sleep and rejuvenation activities to improve health away from home... This villa will set the tone for the future direction of the company and is the showcase for other upcoming properties in the near future... first luxury collection... unique and different experience for the guest... Cocooned inside the leaf is the posture of hospitality care with bowing face and hugging arm, symbolizing the service we offer... These colours represent our service philosophy and trademark&mdash;it's a sales leaflet, not an encyclopaedia article
 * You spamlink to a company video world of options to help your shape your experience in Bali. Here a video experience


 * I see no indication that it meets our notability criteria, just another hotel. Your sales pitch gives no indication of notability
 * the article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. Much of this was copied from a page marked © 2015 The Leaf Jimbaran - All rights reserved. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.

Your edits and refrences to we and our' indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. We normally restore deleted text to a user subpage on request, but for legal reasons we do not do so with copyright violations.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Jim is this article acceptable ? i follow some hotelier wikipedia page like below :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayana_Resort_and_Spa_Bali https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rimba_Jimbaran_Bali https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Seasons_Hotel_Chicago

I really understand, this article is not perfect yet, but i will edit more one by one.

More
I have advised you not to edit this topic, but if you do so, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . Do not edit until you have made that declaration.
 * As I said before, I see no indication of why it meets the notability guidelines. It will be deleted anyway unless you can show why it is notable
 * Your suggested text still has virtually no facts, a promotional tone, and copyrighted text
 * If you want to do a draft, do so here, not on this talk page. I'll remove the draft text after I've finished this
 * I'll look at the articles you linked

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)