User talk:Giants2008/Archive 18

Re: FLC question
I have addressed all outstanding comments on Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Alexandra Burke/archive1 so I assume that means I have your permission to nominate another now. Thanks. AARON &bull; TALK  10:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Alexandra Burke/archive1 has 5 supports and all issues have been addressed. Is it worthy of being promoted?! AARON &bull; TALK   16:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Lillard
Here's one source (this is just a generic book ref for reference):

Quote, page 35: "Although blacks were not welcome in the NFL, there was nothing in writing where it was spelled out, no contract or other written agreement between the league's owners. But there was an understanding firmly in place since 1933 that each of the owners unwaveringly adhered to. Prior to 1933, that had not been the case. Even then most NFL teams did not employ blacks, but a few did. Outstanding black players like Duke Slater and Fritz Pollard made an important contribution to the game that went well beyond their small numbers. It's not exactly clear what changed in 1933, but the arrival of George Preston Marshall as owner of the then-Boston Redskins the year before is often cited as an important turning point. Marshall was a segregationist from Washington, DC. He would own the Redskins for more than thirty years, and his franchise would bear the shame of not hiring a black player until 1962, the last pro football team to do so. The Marshall explanation has merit but hardly provides the entire answer. Men like George Halas, whose life was football and who had struggled through so many different times to keep the NFL alive, willingly and decisively ceded to the newcomer Marshall. The NFL's other established owners were likewise too quick to go along with Marshall." Etcetera. --Batard0 (talk) 02:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Mind reviewing List of Houston Texans Pro Bowl selections?
Hi Giants2008! I've recently finished reworking List of Houston Texans Pro Bowl selections, which you quick-failed at FLC in January mainly due to an abundance of copied paragraphs from Pro Bowl and Houston Texans. Care to look at it now? The lead is a bit short (I'd love any suggestions regarding that), but otherwise, all your points have been addressed. Is it FLC ready? Buggie111 (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doubleday myth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Chadwick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

FLC
Hi, I need your opinion here. Regards. Zia Khan 12:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Doubleday myth
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter
The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to, our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009),  (2010) and  (2011). Our final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The featured article award goes to, for four featured articles in the final round.
 * The good article award also goes to, for 19 good articles in the second round.
 * The list award goes to, for three featured lists in the final round.
 * The topic award goes to, for three good topics (with around 40 articles) in round 4.
 * The did you know award goes to, for well over 100 DYKs in the final round.
 * The news award goes to, for 10 in the news items in round 3.
 * The picture award goes to, for two featured pictures in round 2.
 * The reviewer award goes to both (14 reviews in round 1) and  (14 reviews in round 3).
 * Finally, for achieving an incredible bonus point total in the final round, and for bringing the top-importance article frog to featured status, a biostar has been awarded to.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

NFLPA
I have responded to your comment at the NFLPA FAC. I wanted to get your feedback on the third paragraph of the intro again after changing it as I have yet to hear from others. Thanks. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 20:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
TBrandley 01:31, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for providing the review. I'm done editing for tonight, but will address the comments first thing tomorrow. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 02:43, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan
Hi, the list is at Peer review and I need your feedback here. Regards, Zia Khan 02:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Rihanna discography FLRC
??? Have you read the article? Till 08:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
TBrandley 03:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Harold Larwood
I notice that you usually join in the reviews of cricket biographies. I am just finishing Larwood, my first (and almost certainly last) venture into this field. It has been quite thoroughly reviewed on the article's talk page, but a fresh pair of informed eyes would be very welcome, if you can spare a few moments. I'd be most grateful, but fully understand other pressures on time, etc. Brianboulton (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Saqlain Mushtaq
Hi, any chance you could have your comments on Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Saqlain Mushtaq/archive1? Regards, Zia Khan 12:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your concerns have been addressed, please have a look. Regards, Zia Khan 13:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Adele/archive1
Do I have permission to nominate another FLC as my Adele FLC has 9 supports. AARON &bull; TALK  14:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Canada's Wonderland attractions
I have fixed all the issues you mentioned on the review page.--Dom497 (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Natchez Massacre FAC
Hi, I wanted to notify you that I opened a second FAC for Natchez Massacre, Featured article candidates/Natchez Massacre/archive2. If you have any more thoughts on the article, please, do comment at the nomination page. Jsayre64  (talk)  15:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much for the barnstar! It's always a great feeling to get some recognition from other editors, and it's much appreciated. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 01:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Younus Khan
Hi, any chance you could have a look at Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Younus Khan/archive1? Regards, Zia Khan 00:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
AARON &bull; TALK  00:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Roy Simmons, Jr.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

"The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati" FAR
Thanks for pointing out some issues that needed to be addressed I believe I fixed them, in addition, the article has received a copy-edit from Crisco 1492, here. He suggested several things, that I fixed as well as a few new additions, here. I honestly feel that this article is now truly up to par with what you guys were wanting, and I truly appreciate you digging in and helping me improve it. Any more comments and suggestions would be great.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   17:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Arsène Wenger
Hi Giants2008. I've decided to renominate this article on FAC and would appreciate if you could spare the time to comment and/or vote, given you commented on the previous nom. I guess it failed because of a lack of spotchecks, so if you could also take a look at that, I would be grateful. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for all your help. I intended to take a break whatever the outcome of the nomination was and I probably won't return to editing full-time until late Spring. By then the soccer season shall be over, giving me enough time to look over the sources -- shall ping you with any updates/requests. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk Back
Thanks for the comments.  TheSpecialUser TSU 14:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk Back
Buggie111 (talk) 01:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Wenger FAC
I noticed your comments at the Wenger FAC, and had similar thoughts myself. I supported last time (eventually) but managed to miss quite spectacularly all of Brianboulton's very valid points about the lead, which is slightly embarrassing. As I think it is pretty good overall on a tricky subject (if you know anything about English football, you may know he's quite a polarising figure at times), I was going to do another copy-edit myself before commenting. So I'm not treading on your toes, and if it's not too much of a pain, let me know when you are done (I'm in no rush: I'm quite busy myself this week) and I'll have a look as well. Cheers. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Your point concerns me slightly as I uncovered similar issues in the last FAC. Like you, I'm reluctant to copyedit and have, with some regret, opposed. If the nominator checks the sources again, I will reconsider, but I think more spot-checking would be required afterwards. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

FLC
Hi sir, how are you? Well I'm here regarding questions about FLC. I had newly joined Wikipedia and had done quite good for myself and I had contributed to many articles, one of them is List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra. I had contributed mostly to this list and I want to take it to FLC. Please, tell me how to begin and even tell me how it has shaped up. Thank you.Pks1142 (talk) 12:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello sir, well I'm working on that list of chopra's awards and I want you to tell me how it is shaping up. I'm working in my sandbox 3. Pls tell me about its goods and bads.Pks1142 (talk) 08:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi sir, i had requested for the peer review for the list. Please help for the same and i think it will improve a lot.Thank You.(Pks1142 (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2012 (UTC)).

LGS FLC
I've taken steps to address your concerns at Featured list candidates/List of Looking Glass Studios video games/archive1. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Mike Capel/archive1
Thank you for the review of Mike Capel. I have responded to your comments there. Albacore (talk) 22:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

May I please nominate Doc Adams for Today's Featured Article on January 3rd? I want your opinion please.--Lucky102 (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
undefined — Bill william compton Talk   03:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Request
Hi Giants! Sorry to bother you, but would you be willing to provide a peer review for my potential featured list candidate, List of airports in the Okanagan. The peer review is located at Peer review/List of airports in the Okanagan/archive1. Happy Holidays, TBr  and  ley  22:24, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It may be a few days before I get around to visiting the PR, but I promise to provide input at some point, hopefully by the end of the weekend. Happy holidays to you as well! Giants2008  ( Talk ) 01:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Till 13:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
TBr and  ley  03:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Your help
Hi, I'm getting more and more feedback on Chopra's list PR. Its now getting better and better and I think all the issues are now sorted out. You can take a look at the improved article, which is now well referenced and formatted. Still, I need your suggestions on the way the list has shaped up. Thank you.Pks1142 (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Tomíca (T2ME) 11:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC) — Tomíca (T2ME) 09:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Astros4477 ( talk ) 22:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

PR of Gateshead International Stadium
Hi Giants.

Thank you for providing a thorough review of this article. It is much appreciated. I have addressed all but one of the issues you raised (the last one is very difficult and is likely to prove impossible, but hey-ho) and wondered whether or not you think it is worth now giving the article a crack at FAC? I ask as I seem to be fine at getting things through GA but have had no success at FAC in the past and don't want to waste the effort trying again if the article isn't up to the standard required... Meetthefeebles (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan
Hi, any chance you could have a look at Featured list candidates/List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan/archive1? Thanks, Zia Khan 15:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive4
I had addressed all of the concerns that you listed at Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive3. Please consider commenting at Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive4.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Pls, continue the Review at the Archive page....your Questions has been resolved.— PKS: 1142  · (TALK) 02:40, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

PR
Hello, as requested by all of you a peer review is currently going on Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2. Please, contribute to the PR and help it in its improvisation.— PKS: 1142  · (TALK) 08:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 starting soon
Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!
Hello Giants2008, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders: *The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page. *Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking. *If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself. *Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens. *Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked. Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 18:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hello sir, you suggested to withdraw the list and hold a PR. I did the same but anyone is not even presenting their thoughts over the list. It has blocked my working schedule as I was supposed to start editing new article but due to this list, I'm struck in between. Please, present your thoughts and issues on the archieve page. Not even one reviewer is interested, if i renominate it then they oppose. I'm asking when a PR is going on then why they not present their issue now. I think it's unfortunate for me and my work. Please, help me.— PKS: 1142  · (TALK) 19:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Halloween II
As required, I've raised issues at the talk page. How many months before starting another FA review? --George Ho (talk) 04:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Washington v. Texas FAC
Hi Giants2008! I've made changes to the article based on your suggestions on the FAC page. All the best, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Fortress of Mimoyecques FA nomination
Thank you for your help with the featured article nomination of Blockhaus d'Éperlecques. I thought you might like to know that I've nominated a related article, Fortress of Mimoyecques, for consideration as a featured article. If you have any comments on the nomination, please leave them on Featured article candidates/Fortress of Mimoyecques/archive1. Prioryman (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup
Hello, Giants2008, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:
 * The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
 * Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started and completed the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
 * If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
 * Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
 * Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 13:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

PR
First of all, Happy New Year. Please, help me on the peer review of Priyanka Chopra list of awards and nominations. As decided during flc, to get wider opinions on the list the PR is going on. Pls, contribute and help me regarding its PR. This time, i don't want to be left behind. I want it to be complete and one of the best lists on Wikipedia. Please contribute and help me. Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive2. Thank you.— PKS: 1142  · (TALK) 19:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)