User talk:Giantsshoulders

Hi Giantsshoulders--

I see you've been doing some major editing to the Canna (plant) article. You note that there are two major (and somewhat differing) classifications of the genus. It would be very helpful if you could include publication citations of these two treatments in the article. MrDarwin 14:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Giantsshoulders 16:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Citations added to the main Canna article.
 * Thanks! I've worked on this article in the past but I don't have a copy of Tanaka's revision so I never edited any of the taxonomic part. One note though: I see you have also been editing the species articles, e.g., Canna indica. Please note that, unlike zoological names, the author citations for botanical names include the combining author as well as the basionym author, e.g.: Canna indica var. sanctae-rosae (Kraenzl.) Tanaka. You should be able to get the names from either IPNI or Tropicos. MrDarwin 16:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

--Giantsshoulders 13:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks, I wasn't aware of the authors requirement, are they OK now?

License tagging for Image:Micropropagation.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Micropropagation.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Canna TrinacriaVariegata 20030824 001.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Canna TrinacriaVariegata 20030824 001.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Canna Allemania1844.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Canna Allemania1844.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Canna AntoineCrozy 1100.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Canna AntoineCrozy 1100.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Speciosa 9189.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Speciosa 9189.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Canna
Regarding this category, it's redundant with Category:Cannaceae because the family is monotypic and has no other genera. It is therefore unnecessary and I will nominate it for deletion again. Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 13:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Question about contributions
Following on the above work, I looked through your contributions and another user's contributions (CannaCollector) and wondered if you might be using two accounts. The contributions are similar including the language used when creating a new article ("ORIGINAL"). Forgive me if this is not the case, but it is against Wikipedia policy to use sockpuppets. If you'd like, I believe they can merge one user account into the other. Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, they and a couple of others including at least one IP appear to be one, a check user run to see if they were Brya socks already confirmed they use the same IP, see Brya's talk page for more information. However, the various accounts don't appear to be attempting to hide anything like the fact that they are sock puppets, or using the accounts to hide anything or double their voting or anything at all.  KP Botany 21:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * True, it's not a sockpuppet situation, but it is mighty confusing and Wikipedia policy is that one editor should only have one account unless for a very specific reason (like a Bot account or one instance of another user running an account to host all the userboxes). So if they are indeed all the same editor, the accounts should be merged. --Rkitko (talk) 02:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have both accounts because I can never remember user names and passwords, and as I post from several locations I refer to locally written down details. I have no problem with them being merged, I'll just make an effort to get better organised. I was not aware of the term sockpuppet and it's implications until this message. How do I get the accounts merged? Giantsshoulders 15:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I assumed that was the case, that you simply used different accounts because you lost a password or whatever, as I've done the same thing, but didn't want to quite say that. I don't know how you get them merged.  I will ask and find out from a brand new and eager admin.  This will resolve the issue.  KP Botany 19:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for responding. That's what I assumed as well. For future reference, Wikipedia can always retrieve your password. When you get to the login screen, enter your username and select "E-mail password" and it should be mailed to you quickly so you can log in. I'm not sure how they're merged either, but we'll figure it out! Do you have any other accounts you want merged in? Is also yours? Best, --Rkitko (talk) 20:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Rkitko. I asked User:Acalamari to let us know how it is done and do the dirty work when Acalamari gets a free moment.  KP Botany 20:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Acalamari is clueless, and Acalamari is a careful searcher. I will ask a more experienced admin.  At this point I'm more curious, because I believe it has been done.  Until such point, we just ask Giantsshoulders that you simply maintain the one account, this user name, and add this user name to the one IP account that you use.  I'm not concerned about your using multiple accounts because you have not attempted to hide any such usage, and you have not done anything that sockpuppets often do.  I had not heard of sock puppets until Wikipedia, either.  They are accounts created solely for the purpose of supporting another account in some way.  For example, if I nominated an article for deletion and a lot of people disagreed with me about the deletion, I might create another account and vote in the article for deletion to support myself using the sock puppet account.  For now, there is no concern, though.
 * We are discussing the categories question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants. Feel free to join us if you have any comments, but the issue will be decided and sorted out, and when it is I will help you recategorize, and I am certain Rkitko will also, should that be necessary.
 * Thank you for the excellent work you are doing on the cultivars. Although we had a major disagreement about the inclusion of the one statement on the Maas article, I understand that it is sometimes difficult if you look at plants from either a horticultural perspective or botanical to cross to the other side.  Your work on the cultivars is very good and important to Wikipedia.  Maybe we can pick a really good one about a well known Canna to get to good article, then featured article status for the Main Page?  I will be glad to help you, if you can find a good one, and other botany editors will also.  It is a nice reward when you've worked hard in a specific area of plants to be able to promote them to some of the best of Wikipedia, although it is a lot of work and can be very frustrating, also.  KP Botany 04:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Micropropagation.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Micropropagation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

Having created the image and donated it, what else do I have to do? Please get sensible!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B (talk) 04:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Personal Attack Warning
Consider this a first warning for your personal attacks on another user at the Talk:Canna (plant) page. I have asked another user to look into the images, make a decision, and post on the article talk page. User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim is working hard to provide good images for articles on wikipedia. You could have helped, in addition to showing that you had the sort of expertise necessary to help with putting appropriate images into articles, by speaking in a manner that showed knowledge or anything besides childish name calling.

what sort of idiot are you

morons who have a pretty picture

In the meantime, please stay away from the article and its talk page until someone else has made a decision and you have gained an equanimity of manner that would be useful in discussing an appropriate image for the article.

--KP Botany (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I accept that I became incensed when I saw what was being perpetrated on an article in which I have invested much effort. The image is of an unknown cultivar with no merit as a garden plant. I cannot believe that anybody would do such a thing to an article on roses, so why should Canna be any different? When the name hybrida was foisted as a valid Canna term I admit that I lost my rag at this gross level of ignorance being perpetrated on what I, and other Canna authorities, consider to be the definitive Canna article. The person concerned only had to read the article, and its associated articles on Canna species and cultivars to realise that this was not a good idea. However, I am now calmed down enough to discuss the matter reasonably. Giantsshoulders (talk) 07:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

As I am now banned from contributing to the articles that I created, I have decided to abandon Wikipedia to its own destiny. Already, seeing a pathetic hybrid photograph headlining the genus I have now recognise when the circumstance when the inmates have taken over the asylum! Nobody with any Canna knowledge or experience would sanction such a photograph, only a self-opinionated, ignorant, generalist would think that it served the genus at all. I am just embarrassed to see that photograph on the Canna page that I created. What damage are you planning on the other 20 or so other associated pages that I created? I don't think that I want to know! Sorry, I don't need the pain. Goodbye. Giantsshoulders (talk) 20:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Canna Allemania1844.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Canna Allemania1844.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW ( Talk ) 04:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
NW ( Talk ) 21:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Canna TrinacriaVariegata 20030824 001.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Canna TrinacriaVariegata 20030824 001.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:22, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ELAROO ebay S4300013.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:ELAROO ebay S4300013.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Flaccida Loddiges.jpg


The file File:Flaccida Loddiges.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Canna Jacobiniflora.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Canna Jacobiniflora.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗ plicit  01:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:POLONAISE S4300005-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:POLONAISE S4300005-1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗ plicit  01:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)