User talk:GibberFishing

January 2020

 * I am not an admin, I am not a CU. I did not perform the check user. I simply stated that something seemed up. is the one who blocked you. He might be able to clarify.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 13:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe did the checkuser and concluded that I have nothing to do with that range-block. It is also obvious that my edit has been made prior to the range-block. I am currently on a range that is not blocked and I have no control over my IP address. They assign one to me while I travel.
 * Not sure why you think something seems up. Could you please explain what was wrong with my edit? Your edits caused others to ignore the issue leaving a big question unanswered. One that has nothing to do with trolling. Drmies can consider any deadname on a talkpage a violation, but if there is no guideline or help-page that says it actually is, then it simply is not a violation. Speaking about violations, my current block goes against all guidelines on how to block users. Time fighting would be better spend looking for consensus to (re)write guidelines or help-pages so people are educated.
 * For the record I did not use a deadname anywhere nor did I encourage anyone to do so. GibberFishing (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought that it was up that your first edit was to a talk page where I responed to an IP asking about MOS, in which due to the IPs other edits, the info that it had to due with a WP:GENDERID problem. Its a bit odd that your account edited only that page to responed to me. Most Users dont edit a MOS talk page as their first edit, when I pointed out my thoughs on AIN, I was assuming good faith, but somthing did seem off. Ask the blocking admin if you want their reasoing or send an email to the given adress, there is nothing more I can tell you that I have not already told you.  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 15:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That edit was made before there was a block. The block is totally unrelated to WP:GENDERID, it has something to do with Iran. Not blaming you, but admins should not block people just because something is odd. GibberFishing (talk) 16:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I thought twice, and the checkusers who have looked at this saw no reason to accept your unblock request. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Drmies, where did they say this? The checkuser I mentioned in the link above has said exactly the opposite. Please read Administrators. GibberFishing (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Let me quote the checkuser: The range block and its predecessor have nothing to do with the subject of this discussion.
 * You're not listening or paying attention. Favonian is not a checkuser; I am. The rangeblock placed by Favonian has nothing to do with you; the block that I placed on your account has everything to do with you and the block you were evading--a block that I am not going to disclose here, since we don't link IPs to accounts in public. This account is blocked, essentially, for block evasion, not for one single edit on an MOS talk page. But that's all the time I'm going to spend on this. Drmies (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That is a shame. I was not evading a block because none of the IP addresses I have used were blocked at the time of my edit. I have nothing to do with the reason they got blocked and have not violated any guideline. You are not the only checkuser. Some other checkuser can confirm that I have nothing to do with this and since you are the one who banned me, you cannot be the one to review my appeal. I have given you a change to correct this if it was a mistake, but it seems you did it on purpose. You will eventually be held Administrators. I have not deadnamed anyone, if that is even a guideline! Rather than trying to kill the conversation on the MOS, you could help improve it and seek consensus for your deadnaming policy. An admin acting like a militant activist on wikipedia is unacceptable. How can you be neutral in topics like this, while it says on your userpage that you have three genders? I see no logic in what you are doing. GibberFishing (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It does not even take a checkuser to verify that there can be no block evasion. Anyone with common sense can look in the logs and see that the IP range was blocked after I made my edit. But if you are a checkuser then you are also able to tell that the IP address I am using is a dynamic address from my countries biggest mobile provider. I just checked my logs, other than rangeblocks there is no block in place on any of my recent IP address.GibberFishing (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , I believe the time has come for you to maybe weigh in here. This blockevading editor is ruining my vibe. "Militant activist"--insert eye roll emoji Drmies (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)