User talk:Gibnews

Falkland Islands Article in Arbitration
Having briefly reviewed the article's discussion history, I've identified you as a potentially aggrieved editor whose contributions may have been negatively impacted by the actions of a group of editors who are alleged to be POV-pushing and engaging in WP:GAMES. I invite you to peruse the arbcom request and voice your opinion and experiences, at your leisure. The link is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WP:NPOV_and_WP:GAMES_in_.22Falkland_Islands.22_and_related_articles

Thank you.Alex79818 (talk) 23:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

unsigned comment added by 195.166.220.191 (talk) 22:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.
Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.

Regards, User:Szhang (WMF) (talk) 07:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Gibraltarpedia
I'm guessing from your name and contributions that you might be interested?~ Victuallers (talk)

You guess wrong. However as its a Gibraltar based initiative it should be free of the interference that has plagued the current wikipedia pages and discouraged me from making any further contribution. gibnews — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.224.7 (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC) I'm so sorry that you have had this experience. I have found the GibraltarpediA controversy frustrating as well. I stopped contributing to DYK for several weeks over it. Certainly, however, there should be no requirement that you publish your real identity to upload images. If someone is mandating this, they are incorrect. Anne (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Clarification motion
A case (Gibraltar) in which you were involved has been modified by which changed the wording  of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee -- S Philbrick (Talk)  21:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Whereas I thank you for the information, I no longer wish to participate in a project where agents of the Spanish Government rewrite history 'their way' and get away with it. Life is too short to waste and unlike them, nobody paid me. --Gibnews (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)