User talk:Giftednumber10

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Robdurbar 15:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

FC template
Please be sure to use the brackets instead of the square ones for the  template. Thanks. - Dudesleeper 13:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Alan Keith
I noticed you restored the disputed fact that Alan Keith and David Kossoff are/were brothers. Does you have a reliable cite for this one way or the other? The filial reference in both entries were removed by 212.135.163.83 (talk) in June 2008. Both the BBC who employed both of them and the Independent  seem to think they were, although an 11 year age gap and some discrepancies in their (sketchy) early biographies suggest they possibly were not. There seems to be far less in the Kossoff obituaries (2005) referencing Keith than vice versa (2003).Stevew2022 (talk) 15:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Your diminishment of song article #1 succession box info
Why are you removing content from song article succession boxes? The boxes contain a span of dates when the single held the top spot for more than a week. "Band of Gold", for example, held the UK #1 spot for six weeks. If this is the result of some new decision from a Wiki project discussion, you need to cut-and-paste a link to this decision in your edit summary so people understand the reason for this edit. I'll watch this page for your response. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I am in the process of amending a lot of incorrect dates that are in place for the UK number ones. Not all have the editing that you speak of and I am trying to make them have a uniform look whereby they give the date that they reached number one one on and the weeks spent at number one if more than one. You will see that Band Of Gold has been restored to show it was number one for six weeks after the date it reached number one which I think looks tidier than giving the span of time it was number one for.

Giftednumber10 (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Giftednumber10! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) David Needham -

Ted Vizard
Hi, regarding this edit you made some time back, is it possible to add in-line citations for any of the text in his article that has come from the Macey book? Thanks Eldumpo (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Take Me Bak 'Ome


The article Take Me Bak 'Ome has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable enough as a stand-alone article. Fails WP:NSONG.  Information can be included in album's article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 11:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Off the Wall (album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:08, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing content from Off the Wall (album)
This edit removed a substantial amount of content from the GA listed article Off the Wall (album), and you marked it as a minor edit. Your other edits appear to be solid, so I assume this was an error. I note, though, that almost all your edits are marked as minor, so I assume you have set minor edits as your default. As minor edits by established editors are usually overlooked by other users looking for potentially damaging edits, it means that such mistakes are not so quickly picked up. It would be helpful if you a) marked your edits by default as standard, and b) reviewed any edits you make to check there are no errors before moving on. While accidents do happen, it's worth taking steps to minimise them. Regards  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  21:25, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smashie and Nicey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Powell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Ellen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Ellen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Ellen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 05:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)