User talk:Giggy/Archive/August 2009

== Wikipedia Signpost : 3 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Voltron Unite!
g'day buddy, looks like the finger is on the move in the studio again. fancy finishing what we started a couple of years back and tidying the f^&* out of the Finger articles, and maybe even pushing a couple more up to FA? We'll be receiving the new album by the end of year, so it'd be nice to have a few more up there by then. What do you say? Shall we switch WP:FING back on? -- rm 'w a vu  05:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2009
SoxBot (talk) 08:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Voltron Unite!
g'day buddy, looks like the finger is on the move in the studio again. fancy finishing what we started a couple of years back and tidying the f^&* out of the Finger articles, and maybe even pushing a couple more up to FA? We'll be receiving the new album by the end of year, so it'd be nice to have a few more up there by then. What do you say? Shall we switch WP:FING back on? -- rm 'w a vu  05:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry man, no time or enthusiasm for it :( Giggy (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 10 August 2009 ==


 * Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
 * News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessessment of Crowded House
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a number of concerns with the article and have delisted it from Good Article status as it no longer meets the criteria nd is likley to need considerable work to regain it. You can see the review at Talk:Crowded House/GA1. If you do not agree with my assessment you may challenge it at WP:GAR. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost : 17 August 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
 * Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
 * News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost : 24 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
 * Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Category question
I created a category for Category:Romeo and Juliet films that I'd like to verify if I've it right before proceeding much further.

This category (which has potential to reference 50 or so films and screen adaptations), I intended to be a more specific category within Category:Shakespeare on film. As I understand it, it would be redundant to include both Category:Shakespeare on film and Category:Romeo and Juliet films, but it doesn't feel right removing the Shakespeare on Film category.

Am I doing the right thing?

Thanks. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 21:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)