User talk:Giggy/Archive/September 2008

Mudkip
Any real reason why there wasn't enough sources? Do I need to also add a few YouTube links? I did just figure that the Times was enough, but if its not, just tell me and I can go in and add more. Thanks if you could reply on my user talk page or whatnot. I just want to contribute. Lord Ve&#39;Rhos (talk) 04:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

PR request
I understand you "do" PRs. Could you please review Léon M'ba at Peer review/Léon M'ba/archive2? --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 20:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ya, as I have time. I've thrown it on my watchlist and will try to get to it at some point. —Giggy 22:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter for August 2008

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  01:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Question for WP:AN/IMAGE
Hey gig, User:Endlessdan has an image question, I don't know the answer. He uploaded this pic, does his rationale look okay? I have yet to dabble in image work outside of a few obvious CSDs. What does he need to add if the picture is to be acceptable? Reply here, AN/K, or here. Cheers, hope yer well mate -- Keeper  76  15:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yo Giggy - here is a little more info on this cat. He's been dead for over thirty years and no "promo pics" were ever distributed (to the best of my knowledge). --Endlessdan and his problem 16:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, dude, thank you! Image questions always come up for me and you are now the chosen one. --Endlessdan and his problem 13:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

And so it begins... Is this photo's tag okay? --Endlessdan and his problem 13:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Needs a fair use rationale; basically a statement that explains why you need to use a nonfree image for a specific article.

Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Hi, there is an extremely long and muddled discussion going on at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found on tennis player articles (i.e. this type of table), and I'm notifying you as you identified yourself as a member of the project. The dispute is over the "Tournament Name" column, with the options being to either use the "sponsored tournament name" - in other words, the name involving the sponsor, for example Internazionali BNL d'Italia - or the "non-sponsored tournament name" - in other words, Rome Masters. I appreciate that this conversation is very long and convoluted, so a brief summary can be found here, which is also where I request the discussion continues. Thanks, rst20xx (talk) 23:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Phan Xich Long
Tweaked and improved I hope.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 03:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Audio samples for Thriller (album)
Hi Giggy. Currently we only have an audio sample of the title track. Could we have a sample of another track. I can't make audio samples myself but was wondering if you could help me? Generally speaking wikipedia has very few audio samples on Jackson. Anyway it would be nice to have an audio sample on one of the lesser know, yet well received tracks such as "Human Nature". — Realist  2  00:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to any of the tracks myself. If you download Audacity (free), making audio samples that work for WP is really easy, and I can step you through it if you like. —Giggy 09:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do, someone voted oppose a few hours after I sent you that message, over something that can be resolved with more audio samples. — Realist  2  11:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Eek. :S Basically download the program, open the file in it, crop it out so it's about a 30 second sample, optionally add some fade ins and fade outs (from the effects menu). Go Edit --> Preferences, and in the box that shows up change the OGG quality to 0 (zero). Then go File --> Export as OGG vorbis, give it a file name, and save. You can use User:Giggy/Audio when you upload for an easy FUR. —Giggy 11:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to open a track in the program and it keeps saying that I need to convert it to a supported audio format because it has patent restrictions. Makes no sense to me. — Realist  2  12:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Is it an MP3? They work fine, I dunno what other types do/don't work. If you wanna email it to me (g1ggyman@gmail.com) I can take a look (probably tomorrow unless you get it quick... sleep needed). —Giggy 12:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Managed to figure out how to record it. It sounds bloody awful though so I'm going to play around with it a little. — Realist  2  12:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I've got it saved, I just need to know where I go to upload it. The Upload file button on the wikipedia tool box only does images. — Realist  2  12:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah, it works for audio too. Go here. —Giggy 02:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ding dong, lol, no I didn't do them, Ceoil did. — Realist  2  02:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Lucky you - Ceoil's a good guy. Just make sure the FURs are OK. —Giggy 02:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think they are, I will read them again tomorrow and add if needed. — Realist  2  02:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hello! I just wanted to pass along my thanks for your support in my RfA from earlier this week. I hope I did not disappoint you. I am going on Wikibreak and I will let you know when or if I am back on the site -- I am trying to take time away to clear my thoughts and refocus on this and other priorities. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Have a good one. —Giggy 09:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the latest pic help, too! I added the appropriate FU info. And say... what are koalas like in real life? --Endlessdan and his problem 15:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Cuddly :-) —Giggy 02:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games
Hi, a discussion has been started related to the Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games FAC you commented on. Your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated. The discussion is at WT:FAC. (Guyinblack25 talk 14:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC))

Over 9000 - help
Okay, my adoptive parent, I need help

I found a reference on the Anonymous page to Over 9000 and found there was no article on Over 9000. I wrote one here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:UnicornTapestry/WiP/Over_9000

but found the Over 9000 locked, preventing it from being added.

Can we unlock it long enough to move the article? Or can you help me petition to have it at least temporarily unlocked? Thanks.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that article can't really go to mainspace. It's going to need some verifiable reliable sources first. —Giggy 02:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

My RFA
Thanks for voting on my RFA, although it was unsuccessful, I do appreciate the feedback; I appreciate your comment that I “[have] clue” lol, and I really hope I can see you around the wiki! Thanks again!-- daniel  folsom  02:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Bummer. Good luck. Giggy (talk) 06:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Augie March
Dear Dr Reverend Mr Giggy (Esq).

You mean I can't use a mysterious newspaper clipping with no information on its source as an authoritative citation? This is an outrage, I demand to see an administrator!

In all seriousness, I felt a bit iffy inserting that one, so I'm fine with its removal. Cite on! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC).
 * Dang. You had to say this was a joke, didn't you. I'll keep my RfC on you hidden away, then. Giggy (talk) 11:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I usually feel I have to say these things because sometimes I lighthearted japery against process is taken at face value. This of course, only makes it more fun to do, but I put a disclaimer in now... just in case!
 * I was thinking of Requests for adminship/John Carter which earned you a wikilinked LOL. Disclaimer added.


 * Seriously though, I feel I'm already starting to hit the wall I do when I decide to improve an article, and I'm sort of stuck for what we should be adding. Sure, we could do a laundry list of all of the nice things that critics have said about the band, but that doesn't strike me as overly useful.  Can you maybe give me a little direction on ways you would expand the article?  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC).
 * Getting all the history stuff done is my current priority, just because I like to go in order article down. Nice work on the image addition, btw. For musical style, check out Nine Inch Nails which has a good one. I don't particularly like Powderfinger's and want to fix it one day. Silverchair's is OK, I guess, but somewhat unconventional. R.E.M.'s looks good at a glance. But yeah. Just whack stuff on and we can sort it all out later. No hurry :-) Giggy (talk) 06:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'd like to get an earlier image of them to put higher up in the article, but Flickr's only available shots are from that one show in 2007. I sort of feel we'll need another nice picture between the infobox and the "Moo, You Bloody Choir" section, for aesthetic purposes if nothing else.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC).
 * Indeed. There's a few more on Commons but nothing older that I'm aware of. Time to start poking around for people who've been to their shows and asking nicely. Btw. got your email and everything worked fine, hence didn't reply. Giggy (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

cookie
So who got the cookie??? And who were the runners up???--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 02:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Spellcast got the cookie. Runner up was the IP who edit conflicted with me ending it. That was hilarious. Giggy (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I aim to please 92.9.175.37 (talk) 02:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous (group)
Huh? The RPP report said edit warring and vandalism. There is no edit warring - look at the history (or if I've missed something, show me), and we never full protect for vandalism unless it's really bad (you saw what happened with Palin...). Please clarify. Giggy (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, I hit the wrong article. Thanks for the catch. Stifle (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Giggy (talk) 11:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

revisit Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état
Hi, I've left some comments at Featured article candidates/1964 Gabon coup d'état. If you have time, I wonder if you would revisit it? Thanks, Ling.Nut (talk&mdash;WP:3IAR) 00:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted, keeping an eye out. Giggy (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Mistaken identity
Hey! Hello! Hi! Some help please... This pic is labeled incorrectly. Is is not of Edgerrin James. It is of Jonathan Ogden. How can I correct this? --Endlessdan and his problem 20:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure? If so you... well... I can use commons:Commons:MediaMoveBot to rename it. I've tagged it. Should take 24 hours at most, I think. Will keep an eye out and let you know what happens. Giggy (talk) 22:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I never knew about this bot and have already made use of it on another pic that was mislabeled. Thanks again!!!--Endlessdan and his problem 16:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll vouch Giggy, as a colonist, that that is most definitely not Edgerrin James. E-dan has it right. It's definitely Jonathan Ogden. Keeper   76  16:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * *nods* Groovy. Hopefully waiting on rename. Giggy (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I asked this photo be renamed cause this photo has the same name. I'm wondering if they'll look past my request cause I tagged the Commons pic under as an IP user.--Endlessdan and his problem 14:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged it. Should work, just takes a while. Giggy (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Username
Why did you change your name to Giggy? That sucks, I liked your old name... Tezkag72 (talk) 21:37, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Giggy was his name before he changed it to Dihydrogen Monoxide. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Personally, I liked his old name better too... it was my favorite name on all of wikipedia!!! Well, next to Ginkgo100, but H20 wasn't sleeping with me...--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 22:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * .... >_> OK... :P Giggy (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Balloonman: O rly? :) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * changing usernames is teh win. Yarr. fish &amp;karate  11:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fulleh. Giggy (talk) 11:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Hey Venus!/GA2
What makes this review took so long is the use of non-free images. I am nega towards it. Would you please drop some comments to explain to the editor if you find the images WP:NFCC-non-compliant? Thank you. --Efe (talk) 12:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Giggy (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Image help
As you probably already know, I'm notoriously bad with images. Could you resolve the CSD image at Super Smash Bros. Melee please? Thanks, Giggy. Ashnard Talk  Contribs  20:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Should be cleared up. Giggy (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Cheers. Ashnard  Talk  Contribs  16:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Jonathan Bishop
An article you previously voted on in an AfD has been re-nominated. You can see the discussion at This link. Cardydwen (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, not interested. Giggy (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Harry Murray FAC
Hi Giggy, I have addressed the issues you raised for the article Harry Murray, and I was wondering if you would be willing to have a another look at the article and possibly consider granting your support? Thanks for your contributions so far, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, will take another look. Well done. Giggy (talk) 00:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your support. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 08:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

FA thoughts
Thanks; I haven't thought of a new one for a while, though. Maybe I should tag it as completed. Nousernamesleft (talk) 01:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I bet you'll think of some more if you do. ;-) Giggy (talk) 01:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Peter Jones comments
FACs fail for lack of comments? It's not just a relist/keep listed? I've not partaken before apart from the occasional comment. Anyways, I wonder if the sujbject matter might be hosing me. Wikiproject Methodism seems to have exactly one active participant, and Wikiproject Anishishabe seems to have the same. I've personally never commented on an featured article candidate where I didn't know the subject matter. But I've never tried my hand at FAC before, I've cut everything loose by GA, so I really don't know the culture. Wily D 03:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If there isn't enough support they're sometimes archived as a lack of consensus. Luck of the draw. Relisting generally happens if the FAC page is getting too full and nobody has any idea what's going on (though sometimes they just go to a new FAC page, eg. this shitstorm).
 * I usually find that people otherwise uninterested will comment on random FACs (eg. I commented on yours, and just now added some comments on a cyclone tropical storm. It's not like it's a cabal or anything, but I find that adding useful comments on others' FACs helps build the good faith in general and might get some more eyes over to yours.
 * In any case, the article looks great. And that's the most important thing. Giggy (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Striking
Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to review the article. -- Noj r (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries, and you're welcome. Giggy (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Giggy
Are you Dihydrogen Monoxide? Because I can't find him in Special:Log anywhere, and his page redirects to yours.  Spec <font color=#00ff00>ial <font color=#ff69b4>K 18:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Giggy (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit request
Hi, I'm looking for a copyeditor for an article and you were recommended by a user on IRC. I was wondering if you could copyedit Homer Simpson. I've been working on the article for a while and although I was hoping it would be longer than it is, I've pretty much hit a wall and I doubt there is a lot more I can add (other than some analysis). So in order to get it ready for a FAC, it needs some copyediting and I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks for your time, Scorpion0422 02:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll try and pitch in a bit. Ha, someone recommended me? They must be mistaken! Giggy (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, can you let me know when you are done with Homer...I keep getting edit conflicts! :)  C t j f 8 3 Talk 03:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * HAHA, ok, thanks for your help also!! It is greatly appreciated!!  C t j f 8 3 Talk 03:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a look at it, it is very appreciated. -- Scorpion0422 04:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

PCG165 System Shock reference
Posted reply here. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 13:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. Giggy (talk) 13:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Shawn Michaels peer review
Hi Giggy, listen, I want to ask a favor. I wanted your input/feedback on Shawn Michaels' article, since I'm trying to aim to Feature Article status and I want to know what needs to be done first. If you have time, I would appreciate your comments a lot. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh. Time. I'll try and add something there. Giggy (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I appreciate it and I've responded to your queries and thanks again. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

StarCraft: Ghost PR
Heya, if you've got time could you take a look at StarCraft: Ghost and perhaps post a review at Wikipedia:Peer review/StarCraft: Ghost/archive1? I think it's as good as I can get it but I'm sure there is more to be done. Thanks in advance! Gary <b style="color:#02b;">King</b> ( talk ) 04:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Also, I'm thinking of taking it to FAC eventually. Do you think that's fine even though it's an unreleased game – but it is indefinitely postponed? I think it's okay and so does Fuchs, but I'm curious to know what you think, too. Gary <b style="color:#02b;">King</b> ( talk ) 04:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't consider it FAC ready until Blizzard declares it cancelled, personally. I'll try and add something to the PR at some point. Giggy (talk) 09:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay; I feel like plunging in with it anyways, to test the waters. There's a first time for everything! Gary <b style="color:#02b;">King</b> ( talk ) 04:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * True dat. Giggy (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

London Peer Review - Peer review/London/archive5
Hi there,

Thank you for your comments on London's previous FAC at Featured article candidates/London/archive4. Unfortunately, the FAC was closed as a result of some issues which needed to be fixed. London is under going a peer review, so please may I ask that, if you get the time, you review the article again and leave your comments at Peer review/London/archive5?

Thanks, The  Helpful   One  (Review) 11:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * (Copy pasted response) I'll try, no promises. Giggy (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks in advance! :D The   Helpful   One  (Review) 14:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

The Game image
I know it was a good-faith edit, but I reverted your image addition. What you probably don't know is that was created by a sock of indef-blocked user, who at the time was trying to promote his website. Email me if you want additional details. Thanks, OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Bummer. OK. Giggy (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
for helping out with the System Shock 2 FAC. It is greatly appreciated : ) -- Noj r (talk) 00:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :-) Giggy (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Where is your god now?
It's the end of an era... Oh noes! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Snif. I feel you pain (not really). Giggy (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Just Starting Out...
Hey Giggy, I just joined WikiProject Songs and I need kind of need a heads-up on where to get started, so I was wondering if you could review Epic by Faith No More so I how to improve it, and from there how to improve other song articles. Yeah, it's not really a formal peer review, and I know I could check up on the FA articles, which I already have, but I am pretty horrendous at teaching myself things. If you could take the time to help me out, I would really appreciate it.

Thanks and cheers, --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 02:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. Sure thing, I'll leave some talk page comments. Giggy (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Doing our part for the war effort!
You may have noticed the posts going around on WikiProject talk pages about article selection for the Wikipedia 0.7 release. Here's the one at the alt-rock WikiProject: link. Could you go through your related FAs and GAs and add the version links you want to them to use in the physical release here? Thanks, and let me know if you need help with any cleanup when you're selecting article versions. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oooh! I'll go through and do that for any I've worked on. Giggy (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering myself if any discographies should be included. I guess that's something to bring up at the Discographies WikiProject. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I figure you'll have your hands full sorting through the selected WP:Australia articles. If there's something pressing you need cleaned up, let me know and I'll try to help you. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Lockdown
Hi!, my name is William and it is nice to meet you. I have the article Lockdown (2008) under a peer review so that I can get everything fixed to meet FA standards. Would you be so kind and review it, that is if you have the time. It has went under three GA reviews at the sametime (I'll explain later), as well as a peer review and much smaller reviews. Your input will be very helpful and I will be grateful as well.-- Will C  10:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I took a look at the lead and it looked pretty good. If I get the chance I'll take a more in depth look. Giggy (talk) 11:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay.-- Will C  05:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hey Giggy, is there any chance that you can comment on the peer review for Armageddon (2006). I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!  iMa tth ew (talk) 19:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, the wrestling people are taking over this page! :-) Usual response; I'll try. Giggy (talk) 04:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Question regarding Infobox image use at Mother and Child Reunion (Degrassi: The Next Generation)
Hi Giggy. You said at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother and Child Reunion (Degrassi: The Next Generation) to take a look at The Stolen Earth regarding the image box image working with NFCC. I see that one has the caption "Near the end of the episode, Rose cradles a dying Doctor, who has just been shot by a Dalek extermination ray. The scene was written by executive producer Russell T Davies as a pastiche of romance fiction, and described by lead actor David Tennant as a "bitter scene of high emotion"." Should the Degrassi episode article do something similar to meet the criteria, then? Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, essentially, if you're going to use the nonfree image you'll need some critical commentary relating to that specific scene, to show it's noteworthy. "The Stolen Earth" is a good example of this in action in an image caption. I'd suggest you do likewise. Giggy (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The Sword of Shannara
I replied to your comments here. Thank you for taking the time to review this article; I appreciate it very much. Cheers, <font face="Monotype Corsiva"><font color=font color="800000">-talk- the_ed17  -contribs-  15:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted, will respond soon. Giggy (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review
Hello, I am wondering if you could peer reviewed the following sport article Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy at Peer review/Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy/archive1. Thanks—<font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">Chris! ct 05:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Standard response. :-) I've watchlisted the page and will attempt to add some comments at some point. Giggy (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks—<font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">Chris! ct 20:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Giggy. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 23:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Louvre Abu Dhabi
Hi. I see you are a frequent contributor to the GA project. If you have time, could you review the Louvre Abu Dhabi article? Your expertise would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance, -- Jor dan  <sup style="color:blue;">Contribs  07:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I haven't done a GA review in ages. If I have the time I might look at it, but please don't count on it. Giggy (talk) 07:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks, -- Jor dan  <sup style="color:blue;">Contribs  17:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply for Kabuki Warriors explain source reference
Ok fair enough, but i will show you the source anyway to veryfie the claim, 'With a bit of luck, Genki, Lightweight and Crave will be starting work on the long awaited sequel for the great Kabuki fighting game, Kabuki Warriors, if you keep your fingers tied it will be out next year, it is a really fun fighting game that is one of the few that lets gamers know about the japanese art of Kabuki, and it is know about time that the sequel is made, a lot has changed since the releace of this original MS launch title in 2001, for one the Xbox 1 is dead! There are many reasons to name why this game needs a new foray into the gaming market,the main reasonis because of next gen technology but also to make a even better sequel for a already brilliant game' this is my source i have used to veryfie my claim. Thankyou Mcjakeqcool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcjakeqcool (talk • contribs) 14:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. Where did you get this quote from? An interview? A news story? Relevant citation information is required. Giggy (talk) 22:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC) (btw. clicking the "new section link at the top is the easist way to start a discussion on a page... but now that one's started, you can add to it by clicking the "edit" link just to the right of the header.)

=My citation of Kabuki Warriors 2 on Xbox 360=

Well the source i got my citation for Kabuki Warriors 2 in 2009 for Xbox 360 was on a petition for anticipating releace of Kabuki Warriors 2 on Xbox 360, if the source is not relevant for Wikipedia i will cancel it. Thanks. Mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 10:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Concern
I am extremely concerened I posted this coment about 'My citation of Kabuki Warriors 2 on Xbox 360' some time ago and I have still not had a reply, when possible can Giggy please reply, thankyou. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hey!
Wow, how did you notice? I was going to tell you on MSN but you were busy at the time. Yeah, I'm around again but don't know if I'll be doing much before I get bored again...

But for now, I'll be sticking around for a while. Noticed you have something like 20 thousand edits? Guess you didn't quit like me =P -- <font color="#0000aa">Razor <font color='#aa0000'>ICE 13:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No idea how I noticed... the name just popped up, somewhere. Yeah... I seem to have not gotten bored as you did :P Giggy (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Not so much I got bored, just I moved on to other things =P Mainly being school work >.< But hey, we're almost done, huh? :) -- <font color="#0000aa">Razor <font color='#aa0000'>ICE 08:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

RfA nom
Hey Giggy, I have noticed you around the 'pedia and am currently considering running for adminship in 1-4 weeks from now. Seeing as I hold you in high esteem I was wondering if you would be able to nominate me (I'm not sure if that is how it works, let me know if not, i hope I'm not making a fool of myself! ) if you are ok with that. Thankyou very much. Sincerely ^.^|talk (formerly known as Atyndall) 15:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I figure frankness will be appropriate here, and will thus do so. No. If you think you'd make a good admin, nominate yourself. Giggy (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh. I thought self-noms were prima fascae (dunno if that's how you spell it) evidence of power hunger and got you opposes. Well, thanks anyway. Sorry to annoy you. I won't bother you again. — ^.^ &#91;citation needed&#93; 01:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh dear. Your name rung a bell as someone who had been around the RfA area a bit. I'd suggest you read User:Giggy/On Kurt and RfA. (Not annoyed.) Giggy (talk) 01:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thanks. — ^.^ &#91;citation needed&#93; 03:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Bad Blood Peer Review
Hi Giggy, is it possible for you to comment on the above peer review, the images mostly? Thanks.-- S R X  22:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done image comment, may add more later. Giggy (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thankyou! I responded.-- S R X  23:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I responded again.-- S R X  23:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's watchlisted, please don't ping me :-) Giggy (talk) 23:33, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello Giggy
I just got a msg from you. Thanks. Is this the correct way to respond?--Wodawik (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Kmweber block discussion
I don't understand how you can defend him after such incivility. I understand you had a problem with animum brining up his RFA votes, and so did I, but his comments about being refused account creator and his reply to that teacher were completely out of order. He has a long history of such comments, he's dead immature, and he accuses anyone who disagrees with him of hating wikipedia. You probably now this better than me, but I urge you to reconsider your oppose of the block which appears to be based on animum's comments. He hasn't made many valuable contributions in the mainspace at all, he jst seems to like "drama".--<font face="verdana"; font size="2"; font color="green">Serviam <font face="verdana"; font size="2"; font color="green">(talk)  12:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I refuse to take seriously anyone who can't click this link. Your last sentence shows you can't. Sorry. I understand what you're saying and will take it into consideration, however, because I like your username. Giggy (talk) 23:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Re. RFB closed
Thank you for your message, Giggy. I haven't seen you around a lot lately. Wikimedia Commons, that evil maelstrom of editors! :-) Regards, Hús  ö  nd  04:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Legal threats from User:Pérez
You might like to know that a user you recently blocked on commons has made legal threats towards Wikipedia regarding the block. Thanks, Matty (talk) 08:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. His block expired ages ago (seems that post was a while ago too), if he's still upset about it he's welcome to come ask about it. Giggy (talk) 08:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, I really didn't check the date on that diff. Sorry for your trouble, i'm sure the issue resolved itself with time. Matty (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Favor and stuff
I'm doing some heavy multitasking right now cleaning up a bunch of the selected WP:ALM articles (particularly some FAs and GAs people haven't been looking after too well). I'd like to get diffs set for at least the top ten articles on the list as soon as possible. Coud you give Pearl Jam and Radiohead a run-through? Past experience has shown that those two articles are pretty well-maintained and there shouldn't be too much work to do in selecting/creating excellent versions to use for the 0.7 release. If you see some major problems you think need to be fixed, let me know and I'll wrangle with them. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Greetings, WesleyDodds. Bands only or also biographies? I have experience on two music biographies, one electronic music article, and work on AC/DC (Giggy will probably remember that it accidentally re-entered featured article review, and all sound samples were the suspects. Also thanks to whoever knew who's left and right in the photo). -SusanLesch (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * To be clear, as far as I know none of the below is in reply to me. (Sorry to ping, guess I will just copy this to another talk page.) -SusanLesch (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry! I think we should focus on the band articles first, and then if we have a chance get through a few bios too. There's talk at WT:ALM. Giggy (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Woops, sorry, missed me by two minutes. Thanks for your reply just the same. Best wishes, Giggy. -SusanLesch (talk) 00:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I found an announcement when wondering what the hell was going on originally. Anyway, I was just illustrating to -5- that your edits were ok. He's solely a content editor and doesn't keep up with the MOS or anything, but he picks up quick if you show him what to do. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You can do it, unless there's anything you think I should take care of. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help. I'm waiting to see if there are further opinions or suggestions regarding what articles we should remove from the selected queue. I'm not sure how closely the people in charge of handling removal requests are paying attention to the page we're supposed to list them on, so I think it'd be best to list them all at the same time. At this point I'm more focuesed on getting good versions of the pages we definitely want on the 0.7 release. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

List of Muse songs
Why did you revert the edit? Andre666 (talk) 10:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. I reverted it so it was once again a redirect to Muse discography. There's quite a bit of duplicated information with two pages, and the information that isn't duplicated isn't notable. Giggy (talk) 10:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Lists of songs are accepted. Please see Category:Lists of songs by authors or performers to see examples. Please allow it to be reverted back. Andre666 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Shrug. Up to you. IMO all those lists should be deleted, but whatever. Giggy (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review help
Greetings Giggy! I've seen you on the list of Peer review/volunteers who prefer rock. Could you please have a look on Peer review/Meshuggah/archive2 and leave some comments/suggestion/opinion? It would help me a lot.. Have a nice day!--  LYKANTROP   <FONT COLOR="black">✉ </FONT> 11:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure thing :-) Watchlisted, will add some comments. Giggy (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Concerned peer review
Hi, thanks for reviewing the article. I tried to solve the problems you mentioned. would you please take another look at the article and my comment on the PR page? Diego_pmc Talk 16:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Just let me check
Am I right or am i wrong but have you changed your user topic to monthly archives, because my talk discuss coments about Kabuki Warriors are in a archive for September 2008. Just checking! Regards. Mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, could you please use the new section link at the top, or else make a header with two ==equals signs==, not one. Thanks.
 * Yes, my talk page is archived (by User:MiszaBot III, a bot) to month-based archives. Let me know if there's anything you'd like answered. Giggy (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Bande Dessinée portal
Hello, I saw that you are a portal peer review volunteer. I have worked much for the improvement of my portal, but some concerns may remain:
 * Is the image at the top of the page useful and aesthetic, or should I remove or replace it ?
 * Uggh... it does seem somewhat tacky. I'd remove it.
 * Problem with the selected biography: I contented myself with writing a short sentence as an introduction for each personality. Then I wrote the beginning of the biography, then put a link "more..." to the complete article. Is it approriate ?
 * Seems OK. Formatting issue with the more; take a look at (for instance) the more links on P:AUSMUSIC (bold, in brackets, etc.) and format them like that. Also, none of the blurbs should have refs in them (I noted one at Portal:Bande Dessinée/Selected biography/2. Some prefer to have the blurb just a copy paste of the lead, but it's up to you.
 * Selected images are not of the same size. Is it really a problem ? It should be noted that free images for comics are very rare.
 * Should be OK as long as they're not too different.
 * Is the presentation of the news correct ? I did not specified the exact date of each event, only the month, because I do not know it.
 * That's fine.
 * If you have any other recommendations about other aspects of the portal, do not hesitate ! It MUST become a featured portal ! Thanks. (Please reply here).--Pah777 (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * One of the categories is a redlink. The intro box should probably have a word in bold, and ideally it'd be in two or three paragraphs (but it's OK as is...). Should Portal:Bande Dessinée/Selected picture/2 link to Walking on the Moon or something else? Otherwise, looks good! Giggy (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review/Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy/archive1
Doesn't mean to bother you, but I didn't see your comments on this peer review for some reasons after you replied me on your talk page. Do you mind to take a look at this again? Thanks. Sorry to bother you.—<font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">Chris! ct 00:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, thanks for the ping. Had been meaning to get through some more PRs; I'll get to it soon. Giggy (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your welcome. I'm pretty sure I'm going to stay here a while.

Anything you may need, ask me on my talk page.Cristenor (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again..
Can you check the images for No Way Out (2004) by leaving comments on it's peer review? Thanks.-- S R X  02:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, prose comments would be nice, if you have time. Also comments to Bad Blood (2003)'s one would be okay too, but that's if you have time :)-- S R X  02:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Huh?
Hey, the FUR javascript thingy you used on Image:Raptor-red.jpg looked really cool, and so I added it myself, but then I went to edit the FUR and. Do I need to clear my cache or is some magical Wikimedia force confounding me again? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What my question was is whether or not the FUR it creates are directly editable; I click 'edit' and all the template parameters are blank, but it prints out correctly...:

I just cleared my cache too.. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 02:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Or so those are the custom fields and the rest is automatically filled it? Ok, gotcha (not really sure I would want to use that instead, but whatever, I can still adapt the text.)  Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 11:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review/Andrew Bynum/archive1
Hi, Giggy. Could you help me review this article? I'd appreciate it. Thanks, —<font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">Chris! ct 02:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review!

 * Thanks! And well done on your FA. Giggy (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Commons
Ok, I've created a unified login, but it doesn't allow for different usernames (I registered under the name "Sabre" on Commons and Wikiquote). Ah well, the documentation suggests they'll create a system for merging different usernames later. I guess I can just redirect those account userpages on Commons and Wikiquote with a quick explanation of the fact I unified my login. -- Sabre (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Did I break this?
Take a look at the references section on Weather and Water. Is it just me or are they all oddly left aligned? I can't figure out how I broke it... <span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology ( C )( T ) 05:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I looked again and it was fine, but I refreshed and it's gone flush left again, so I don't think it's me. You seen that before? <span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology ( C )( T ) 05:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The look fine for me.... *refreshes* still fine. Maybe it was just a server hiccup... Giggy (talk) 05:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Giggy
Thank you for supporting my RfA nomination, Giggy. I appreciate the confidence. Cbl62 (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Age of Empires II
Hi Giggy, I've done a little copyedit work on Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings, but there's still a lot more to get through. I was working on Development, but I ran into something odd: "Artificial intelligence (AI) was an area that drew criticism in Age of Empires. One cause of this was that AI in the game did not "cheat"; that is, they did not grant themselves additional resources not made available to the human player." I would think that a reviewer would complain if the AI did cheat, not the other way around.

A general note: I'm noticing a lot of links as I go through the text. This is something that certain FAC regulars do not like to see, and I find I'm also becoming more sparing with what I link. For example, when listing the resources of food, wood, etc., the reader is not likely interested in the article on food—it is not closely related with the topic, and we can safely assume the reader is familiar enough with the concept that he will not need to visit it for a refresher. Another case is "economic buildings", which links to Economy. This is a slight surprise—a reader might think he's going to see an economic building article, which sounds kind of interesting, but instead goes to the plain economy article, which has the same problems as food. These kinds of links draw attention away from the more important links.  Pagra shtak  14:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Also, this looks contradictory: "Microsoft promised Ensemble Studios there would be a patch process for The Age of Kings. There was none; the game was released with several bugs that needed attention, but without a process for doing so. The first patch was released 11 months following The Age of Kings' release."  Pagra shtak  18:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * AI issue fixed... hopefully it's more clear now. Thanks for the delinkings, I tend to overlink so having someone look over my shoulder is a good thing. For the patch thing, I've again tried to clarify it a bit. Thanks for taking a look! Giggy (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Meshuggah peer review
Greetings Giggy! I'd welcome if you could resume your comments on Peer review/Meshuggah/archive2. Cheers...--  LYKANTROP   <FONT COLOR="black">✉ </FONT> 20:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Experience musicians
The word can probably stay pulled there... it's sort of stating the obvious. <span style="color:#0D670D; font-family:Georgia, Helvetica;">rootology ( C )( T ) 06:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Henry Earl
Hey Gig! Question about this pic. The man's claim to fame is being arrested 1000 times. He is also homeless, so a free photo would be pretty tough to find. Given that his noteriety is based on being arrested all freaking the time, would this pic and it's rationale be okay? Thanks! Oh and I found this pic here. It's some dudes blog, but he took its pretty obvious that this is a booking photo... and there are many of them. --Endlessdan and his problem 13:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Difficult to obtain or not, the fact is he is still alive. The Foundation has taken a particular stance against this (read Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy, in particular item #3). He's been sentenced to 1000 days. When he is released, all it takes is for a Wikipedia editor to track him down. Given his notoriety and websites that track his existence, this should not be hard. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry Dan, I'm with Hammersoft on this one. If you could track him down and get a photo of him, it'd be sweet, or if any of these are him, they're free to use (most likely), but otherwise we can't use the nonfree one as getting a free replacement is possible. Sorry buddy. Giggy (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

WP:FPOC
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_portal_candidates. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 01:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Ben Lee article
I'm unsure why you deleted my edit to the Ben Lee article concerning his religion. He's been very up front that he's Jewish and one of the links at the end of the article is to "Jewish Musicians." I fail to see why this publicly known fact is not relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.83.210.198 (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. Sorry, that was a mistake. Thanks for fixing it up. Giggy (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Ben Lee rules! 158.83.210.198 (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Bots/Requests for approval/Cydebot 4
I am so sorry, as you said "To have you come out and oppose just because" was not what I meant to do. If you take a look at my contribs, it was my last edit of the night and I forgot to add the most important part, why I was opposing. I have added that now, and have added there. The reason I oppose adminbots is because I feel the most important trait of adminship is judgement, and bots have none. The reason I included so much of the other content is because whenever I oppose an adminbot someone retorts that RedirectCleanupBot is fine, whether I believe Skynet will occur, or whether I plan to do the bot's job manually myself. So I included my counterclaim against each, but completely forgot at nearly 1AM to include the part about bots not having judgement. I hope I was able to clarify my point and/or position and hopefully you still think I "hav[e] pretty good judgement". I would never just show up to a discussion, flout everyone, and disappear. Useight (talk) 15:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
.... Much appreciated. Damn. ::shakes head:: Sure am glad I don't have his problem. Antandrus (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Meshuggah
Greetings! Thank you for your comment on the peer review of Meshuggah (3 days ago)! I have one more question: could you check the language of the first paragraph of this section please? I reworded it and I am not sure if the language is good enough.--  LYKANTROP   <FONT COLOR="black">✉ </FONT> 19:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge FAC
Yo Giggy! I have tried to address your concerns at the FAC. Please take a look. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 11:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Jappa. Your edits look pretty good. I'll try and add some more comments when I'm feeling less tired (and it's only 10pm!), so probably when the FAC next appears on my watchlist. Until then Giggy (talk)

Talk:All the Way (Eddie Vedder song)/GA1
Can you please comments on this review. For me, the article contains far too-detailed information and I'm afraid it fails criterion 3b. If I am mistaken, please say so. Thanks Giggy. --Efe (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What about that criterion? Thanks for dropping by. If cleared, I'll pass it now. --Efe (talk) 12:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it doesn't fail that criterion. Giggy (talk) 12:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm still doubtful. Anyway, thanks for the help. --Efe (talk) 12:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

AoE II
Yeah, I'm going to actually give it a thorough review when I can... by the way, the manual is available via Replacementdocs here, so there's no excuse! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 00:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Happy memories flooding back! Giggy (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the game from the assessment list at the game project, since it's at FAN and assessments is moving very slowly at the minute. If that's a problem please revert me. Good luck with the FA. Someoneanother 19:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Giggy (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

RE: Harry Potter FAC
Hi Giggy,

Thank you for your comments on the Harry Potter FAC located Featured article candidates/Harry Potter. I've looked through them and I think that I've completed all of them (other than the stamps, see the FAC for more information). Please double check, and leave any comments at the FAC.

Thanks, The Helpful  One  Review 13:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Replied on the FAC page. The  Helpful  One  Review 14:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Same as above, replied on the FAC page. The  Helpful  One  Review 14:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Above again! The Helpful  One  Review 14:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied at the FAC. The  Helpful  One  Review 22:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Muse invite
Thanks! Andre666 (talk) 21:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review/Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy/archive1
Hello, Giggy. I am wondering if you could review this one more time and answer my question posted. I'd appreciate it. Thanks—<font color="blue" face="Papyrus" size="3">Chris! ct 01:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

using malking to source facts
Hey, hey, why do you remove this. I asked on the talk page at Talk:Anonymous_(group) (the last two comments), and it seems that there was no problem as soon as soon as I only sourced only facts from that source. Check the text that you removed, they were only hard facts and technical details about how the account was hacked, there was no opinions and no anti-obama ranting. Do you have any problem if I restore it? --Enric Naval (talk) 01:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, sorry, I have a horrible tendency to completely miss talk page discussion and make edits that they are discussing. (Well, apart from my comment there, that is!)
 * Some of what Malkin says can be used in the article, and she works fine as a source for relatively difficult to dispute facts. But "so that Anonymous members could exploit the opportunity by means such as downloading all emails and uploading pornography into the account"—I don't recall anything like this coming up in any reliable source I read about the incident (and I think I read at least 20/30 stories about it as part of 4chan research/doing it for lulz :-)). The anti-Obama ranting was based on other stuff said in her blog, not necessarily anything you wrote.
 * In general you're always welcome to revert me, but (unless you can prove me wrong in this particular case) I don't think the pornography comment should stay in the article. The rest, I'm kinda OK with (and I'll try to keep up with discussion).
 * Cheers, and sorry. I guess this is why they wrote WP:BRD! Giggy (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea, that must why they wrote it :) Basically, the pornography thing is what the hacker intended Anonymous to do, but the email wasn't hacked for long enough for it to happen. As it didn't happen, it wasn't reported anywhere (btw, I can't find where on Malkin's post I found that thing about uploading pronography, and I can't find it on any of the other two sources...hum...maybe I got it mixed up from somewhere...:-/ ). I have restored the info, minus those intentions --Enric Naval (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm cool with that. Giggy (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Space Science Fiction Magazine
Hi Giggy -- just to let you know I've now responded to your query at the Space FAC. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:shiny
Thanks a lot for the barn star. It's always nice receiving one. Much appreciated. (Guyinblack25 talk 00:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC))

Time-delayed Speedy Deletions for fun and profit
Funny, that, as I was looking for a template project. I'd like to have a proof-of-concept template first, but I'd be happy to write up a proposal. Do you think this would be worth going with a full-bore Time-delayed Speedy Deletion route? Or maybe just a userspace proposal, for now? UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The Irony is thick this morning! OK, let me see how the template shakes out, and I'll ping you when I have a working draft. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, I've got a draft article up for time-delayed speedy - have a look at User:Ultraexactzz/Fake Real Person. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's the only problem - and there might be another way to do it, but I drafted this based on PROD. The first template is subst'd, and calls the second (unsubst'd) while hard-coding the timestamp. Automatic tools could, in theory, hardcode that timestamp themselves, which would mean that they use the second template and not the first (subst'd) template. No idea if that's feasible or not, since I've never used anything more complicated than popups. I'll put something together and get more eyes on it. Thanks! UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

archives?
Hey where are the archives? Please give me some info giggy. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ==Level two header. Please.==
 * Archives are right here. Giggy (talk) 23:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)