User talk:GijsvdL

Edit warring over attribution
Please cease edit warring over the required attribution at Melody Thomas Scott. The link Mike Halterman is adding is not spam; it's the proper method of attribution as verified by the Foundation. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with appropriately.  krimpet ✽  19:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You could at least have prevented a revert at Commons by proper use of the edit summary. GijsvdL (talk) 21:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And you could stop sniping at people and making people lose patience with you on both en and nl. Just stop it. Mike H. Fierce! 23:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Melody Amber
Please cease edit warring over the references at Melody Amber. The links that were reinserted by Jisis are not self-promotion; it's the proper method of providing sources to the article. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with accordingly. Guido den Broeder (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You are the vandal in this case. NL.wiki arbcom has taken severe measures against you, just because your shameless self promotion. GijsvdL (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Suit yourself, keep lying. Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Melody Amber chess tournament
I've decided to try something different today: I won't block you if both of you (User:Guido den Broeder) just stop editing chess articles and use discussion to work out your disagreements. Both of you are not allowed to edit a chess article (Except to remove blatantly obvious vandalism/libel) until some progress is made between you. If you wish, I can help mediate the discussion. Scarian Call me Pat!  09:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * (Copied and pasted from my talk page) Nej, Guido and Gijsvdl, it's your own choice on whether you edit chess articles or not but please be aware that both of your separate contributions will come under scrutiny. I have offered to mediate to prevent future blockings. If you show willingness to co-operate together and to accept peace and harmony into your lives on Wikipedia then that is very positive. By immediately dismissing my offer, Gijsvdl, you've shown that you don't want to work together. I recommend that the disputed content in question be analysed to remove any WP:POV, et al. Do you wish to do this or not? If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian  Call me Pat!  15:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * User:Scarian/Med1 - Started here. Scarian  Call me Pat!  16:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me be more clear: I see Guido den Broeder not as a collegue, with which I've a 'dispute'. I see him as an uneducadable vandal, with which we have problems at NL.wiki for years now. NL.wiki arbcom took severe measures against Guido. I'm not in a dispute, I'm just fighting against a vandal. This is not stuff for mediation, the question is if you like to help the vandal or not. GijsvdL (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above information is false. Please check with nl:Arbcom. Guido den Broeder (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please proof that I'm not seeing you as an uneducadable vandal? GijsvdL (talk) 21:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Guido den Broeder
Since you are involved in a dispute with over WP:COI and mediation appears to have failed, I have raised this issue on the conflict of interest noticeboard. I would like to ask you to join the discussion, at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. A ecis Brievenbus 22:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As you can read above, I'm not in a dispute with Guido den Broeder. GijsvdL (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * How do you feel about the article Vereniging Basisinkomen? Migdejong (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

2008 Formula One season
Wat speel jij een vieze spelletjes om je gelijk te halen, zeg. Bah. - Erik Baas (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ik begrijp hier werkelijk niets van. Jij doet zo je best om een prachtig bruikbaar bestand te maken. Waarom wil je dan niet dat andere taalversies daar ook profijt van hebben? GijsvdL (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Kom nou toch, het staat er toch bij ? Het is experimenteel, niet klaar, ik ben er niet trots op, onzeker over vorm en inhoud, en er loopt nog overleg over. Oftewel: ik wil niet afgaan voor de hele wereld, eerst maar eens afwchten hoe het op nl: valt. Hoe vaak moet ik dat nog uitleggen ? - Erik Baas (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Maakt ook niet uit: {nietverplaatsen} betekent NIET VERPLAATSEN. Punt. - Erik Baas (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)