User talk:Gil6362/Big cat

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Gil6362

Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gil6362/Big_cat

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Very concise

Lead evaluation C

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? None added

Is the content added up-to-date? None added

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, it is too short to discuss underrepresented data

Content evaluation C

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? None added

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No it is neutral

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, everything has ample amounts of information on the viewpoints

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation B

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? None added

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they provide primary sources that are reliable

Are the sources current? yes, there is a mix of current and non-current sources

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes

Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation B

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? None added

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? None added

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? None added

Organization evaluation

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? None added

Are images well-captioned? None added

Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? None added

Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? None added

Images and media evaluation

For New Articles Only

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? None added

What are the strengths of the content added? None added

How can the content added be improved? Adding content

Overall evaluation Not Applicable