User talk:Gil987

July 2009
Per Requests_for_comment/Uruk2008, of which you were already warned twice. Stop adding random fringe pseudoscience links to articles like you did again here or you will be blocked from editing. --Enric Naval (talk) 23:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

About this edit adding this source, and ths other edit adding this other source, can you give a cognent explanation of why you keep adding unpublished articles from arxiv.org even after all the advice of getting better sourcs? --Enric Naval (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Arxiv sources published in respected university journals, such as the Cosmological Constant link ,pre-published at "Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,University of Chicago", should meet the verifiabiliy qualifications. --Gil987 (talk)


 * "Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics,University of Chicago" is not a scientific journal, not a newspaper, not a book, not a publishing house, etc. That paper is unpublished. A department putting putting up a paper at arxiv is not publishing that paper, it remains unpublished until it appears in some journal.


 * Also, about adding this other paper, it is an invited lecture at a symposium in theoretical physics. Conference papers don't have the same weight as papers in peer-reviewed journals, and this one is an invited lecture to top it....


 * Get papers that have published at some journal, please. (then we can talk about good quality journals and bad quality journals, but that's a different topic) --Enric Naval (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

You're being discussed
Hello Gil987. Please see User talk:Looie496. You are welcome to add your own comment there. Since you've not responded to any past warnings, a block is now being discussed. You have continued to add questionable references to physics articles, as complained of by others at WP:Requests for comment/Uruk2008. You are also abusing multiple accounts, per WP:SOCK. EdJohnston (talk) 03:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)