User talk:Giligandon

=The biased anti-Jewish page: Racism in Israel=

Rearrangement and clean up - racism by Israeli-Arabs
Rearrangement and Clean up

Ethiopians are already mentioned once, no reason to re-mention it.

An opinion by someone, if it is rightfully included at all, has to be cited, specify as to who says so.

There's no need for double entry of anti-Arabism, the same article exist there also, a link is suffice, or remove the repeated one on either location. Yet, despite its repetition, still, I left the "racist" item about polls, which is maybe the only part that may relate to here.

"Motivations" POV's are neither proven nor facts.

How's such a (slanderous generalization of a people) line an encyclopedia entry " ´´the Jews have been accused of Racism"?´´ (Imagine a line: THE ARABS, or THE MUSLIMS have been accused of racism?) And with an essay as a source...? Has this entry became the anti Jewish racism article?

Motive? The extreme opinion, often used by neonazis, some kind of a sepeculation of linking chosenness to the traditional secular regime in Israel, is weird, to say the least, nor can it constitute relevance to "race" or "ethnicity," an Arab convert to Judaism is as "chosen," has the same status in whatever "chosennes" is. Speaking of motives... Well, how about Arab violence as the motive for discrimination against them? Any argument here? Or the dehumanization of Jews by Arab-Muslims (exposed to Al Aqsa TV describing Jews) as "apes & pigs - for being the anti-Jewish racist motive?

What about racism by Israeli-Arabs?

[So called] "Facts" that are not sourcefully linked to racism or (racial antiSemitism), has no place here.Giligandon (talk) 18:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)