User talk:GillMargS

Review
Your article on Archaeology & Animation it well laid out. Having all those link in-bedded in your article is great, it allows people to explore more. I would suggest adding more photos to keep the reader interested in reading the whole article. Adding a few more references would be good to since your article has a lot of information in it. For the sections A Look at the Story, The Secret of Kells and A Look at the Context, The Emperor’s New Groove, I would suggest finding a way for them to have one title each instead of two each. Overall this article is good and well laid out and interesting. Good job :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamclelland (talk • contribs) 23:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Archaeology and animation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archaeology and animation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Archaeology and animation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joe Roe (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)