User talk:Gillian Young

Welcome!
Hello, Gillian Young, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! CtP (t • c) 23:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

P.S. If you're the same as, then thank you for changing your username. Happy editing! CtP (t • c) 23:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Life After Deletion
Hello Gillian, at Teahouse you were told to contact the deleting administrator, I'm am not the deleting admin nor am I an admin. From looking at that AfD the deleting admin seems to be to so you should contact him/her, additionally you should use an userspace draft to work on the article best wishes. Hope this helps &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted that article and placed it in your userspace where you can continue to work on it. It's here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gillian_Young/Women_Live.  When you think it's ready, you have the option of having it reviewed before moving it live by clicking Submit this page in the box at the top.  I recommend that since otherwise it may be deleted again for similar reasons.  Please let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for taking advantage of the Teahouse with your great questions.  Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Notability
Hi, Gillian. I am a host at Teahouse and I wanted to leave you a few thoughts on notability. Please don't confuse what we call notability with importance or value. When we discuss notability here at Wikipedia, what we are talking about is the standard for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It is a relatively specific concept. Wikipedia, like all encyclopedias, is a tertiary source. That is to say, we only publish what others are writing about any given subject. Since you say you have a magazine article about your subject, now you are on your way to showing notability. Think of it this way...we only publish what others have made note of. So if others are writing about your subject in reliable sources (WP:RS), that is what you need to show that your article should be in the encyclopedia. Each and every fact does not have to be referenced to secondary reliable sources, only the controversial ones. But you have to have references showing that reliable second party sources like newspapers and magazines are talking about your subject to show it should be included in the encyclopedia. Does that clear up the notability question for you? To write back to me, just click on the talk button next to my signature and then click on new section on my talk page. Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)