User talk:Gindomarlo

Cause of death in infobox on José José article
Hello. I can't help but notice that you have repeatedly instated a cause of death on the infobox on José José's article. As I have previously pointed out, per template guidelines on how to most effectively use infoboxes, the cause of death parameter "should not be filled in for unremarkable deaths such as those from old age or routine illness", and only when "the cause of death has significance for the subject's notability."

Cancer is a common cause of death, no matter the type. There are very few circumstances under which someone dying from cancer is a core portion of their notability, and as far as I can tell, it's unlikely that his dying from pancreatic cancer is going to become that. If you believe otherwise, and that the cause merits inclusion, please seek consensus on the article's talk page. Continuing to place it on the article after other editors remove it is unlikely to make the change permanent, and you may become involved in an edit war.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases, you may be blocked from editing.  Sandstein  12:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for placing a disruptively unattractive lead image on Harvey Weinstein, in violation of WP:BLP ("Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy"). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Sandstein  19:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Jackman, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne  (talk  •  contribs)  10:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.